[PATCH v12 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls

Paul Moore paul at paul-moore.com
Thu Jun 6 16:36:03 UTC 2024


On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 11:58 AM Kees Cook <kees at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:35:19AM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
> > This series is a respin of the RFC proposed by Paul Renauld (renauld at google.com)
> > and Brendan Jackman (jackmanb at google.com) [1]
> >
> > # Performance improvement
> >
> > With this patch-set some syscalls with lots of LSM hooks in their path
> > benefitted at an average of ~3% and I/O and Pipe based system calls benefitting
> > the most.
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> With the merge window closed now, can we please land this in -next so we
> can get any glitches found/hammered out with maximal time before the
> next merge window?

It's in the queue, I've been swamped lately as you'll likely notice I
haven't really had a chance to process patches yet during this cycle.

We've also been over this soo many times that I've lost count - you
know this is on my list, I've mentioned it multiple times that this is
now high on the todo list, and your continued nagging does nothing
other than make me want to look at other patches first.  You're not
helping your cause Kees.

-- 
paul-moore.com



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list