[PATCH net-next v3 08/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: separate diagnostic message with # in ksft_test_result_code()
Jakub Kicinski
kuba at kernel.org
Tue Feb 20 19:22:32 UTC 2024
According to the spec we should always print a # if we add
a diagnostic message. Having the caller pass in the new line
as part of diagnostic message makes handling this a bit
counter-intuitive, so append the new line in the helper.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h | 5 +++++
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
index 25e29626566e..541bf192e30e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
@@ -287,10 +287,15 @@ void ksft_test_result_code(int exit_code, const char *test_name,
break;
}
+ /* Docs seem to call for double space if directive is absent */
+ if (!directive[0] && msg[0])
+ directive = " # ";
+
va_start(args, msg);
printf("%s %u %s%s", tap_code, ksft_test_num(), test_name, directive);
errno = saved_errno;
vprintf(msg, args);
+ printf("\n");
va_end(args);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
index a1a794e4b8f6..6157a7b059c6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
@@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@ void __run_test(struct __fixture_metadata *f,
if (t->exit_code == KSFT_SKIP)
ksft_test_result_code(t->exit_code, test_name,
- "%s\n", diagnostic);
+ "%s", diagnostic);
else
ksft_test_result(__test_passed(t), "%s\n", test_name);
}
--
2.43.0
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list