[RFC PATCH v2 7/8] landlock: Add note about errors consistency in documentation

[Mikhail Ivanov]

On 12/10/2024 9:08 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 07:04:53PM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote:
>> Add recommendation to specify Landlock first in CONFIG_LSM list, so user
>> can have better LSM errors consistency provided by Landlock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1 at huawei-partners.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
>> index bb7480a05e2c..0db5eee9bffa 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
>> @@ -610,7 +610,8 @@ time as the other security modules.  The list of security modules enabled by
>>   default is set with ``CONFIG_LSM``.  The kernel configuration should then
>>   contains ``CONFIG_LSM=landlock,[...]`` with ``[...]``  as the list of other
>>   potentially useful security modules for the running system (see the
>> -``CONFIG_LSM`` help).
>> +``CONFIG_LSM`` help). It is recommended to specify Landlock first of all other
>> +modules in CONFIG_LSM list since it provides better errors consistency.
> 
> This is partially correct because Landlock may not block anything
> whereas another LSM could deny a network action, with potentially a
> wrong error code.  I don't think this patch is worth it, especially
> because other LSMs have bugs that should be fixed.

Ok, agreed

> 
>>   
>>   Boot time configuration
>>   -----------------------
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>