LSM: Replace secctx/len pairs with lsm_context

Paul Moore paul at paul-moore.com
Wed Dec 4 20:20:40 UTC 2024


On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 12:16 PM Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> On 12/3/2024 3:06 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 5:54 PM Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> >> On 12/3/2024 1:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 2:29 PM Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> >>>> Paul, do you want a revised patch set for the lsm_context change,
> >>>> or do you want to stick with what's in dev-staging?
> >>> I figured I would just move dev-staging over (I've already ported them
> >>> to v6.13-rc1 in my tree), but if you want to send out another patchset
> >>> I guess that's fine too.  Although looking at the related patches in
> >>> dev-staging right now, excluding the rust update from Alice, there is
> >>> only a kdoc fix (me), a signedness fix (Dan Carpenter), and then the
> >>> two fixes from you.  If you like, I can just squash your fixes into
> >>> the relevant patches since there is no authorship issue, and to be
> >>> frank I'm fine with squashing my kdoc fix too, which leaves us with
> >>> just Dan's fix ... which I think is okay~ish to leave standalone, but
> >>> if Dan's okay with squashing that I can do that too as it would be
> >>> preferable.  Dan?
> >>>
> >>> In case anyone is wondering, yes, squashing does take a little bit of
> >>> work on my end, but it borders on trivial, and it is much quicker than
> >>> re-reviewing a patchset.
> >> I figured that it could go either way. I won't resend. Thank you.
> > No problem.  Just to be clear, do I have your okay to squash your patches?
>
> Yes.

Thanks.  Everything has now been moved over to the lsm/dev branch and
should be in the next linux-next build.  Thanks again everyone.

> I may have introduced some formatting (e.g. tabs in struct definitions)
> that you dislike. Feel free to "correct" any you find as well.

FYI, the only changes I made when going from lsm/dev-staging to
lsm/dev was to squash the patches.

-- 
paul-moore.com



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list