[PATCH] init/main.c: Initialize early LSMs after arch code

[KP Singh]

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:33 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 1:12 PM KP Singh <kpsingh at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > JFYI, I synced with Guenter and all arch seem to pass and alpha does
> > not work due to a reason that I am unable to debug. I will try doing
> > more debugging but I will need more alpha help here (Added the
> > maintainers to this thread).
>
> Thanks for the update; I was hoping that we might have a resolution
> for the Alpha failure by now but it doesn't look like we're that
> lucky.  Hopefully the Alpha devs will be able to help resolve this
> without too much trouble.
>
> Unfortunately, this does mean that I'm going to drop the static call
> patches from the lsm/dev branch so that we can continue merging other
> things.  Of course this doesn't mean the static call patches can't
> come back in later during this dev cycle once everything is solved if
> there is still time, and worst case there is always the next dev
> cycle.
>

Do we really want to drop them for alpha? I would rather disable
CONFIG_SECURITY for alpha and if people really care for alpha we can
enable it. Alpha folks, what do you think?



> --
> paul-moore.com