Hardcoded security module suggestion - stop the stacking insanity

[Paul Moore]

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 7:34 PM Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> The question is what would be acceptable? I've been proposing LSM
> infrastructure changes for a painfully long time. I'd be
> de-f***ing-lighted to hear what would be better than what we have now.
> While I can't change the brain dead behavior of 21st century hardware
> I am perfectly willing to re-write the entire $%^&*( LSM layer if it
> can be done in a way that makes you happy.

Relax Casey, no one is rewriting the entire LSM layer. Perhaps more
accurately, I'm not going to merge a single patchset that throws
everything out and substitutes a single-LSM approach to satisfy a spur
of the moment comment triggered by the latest hardware flaw.

We'll sort out the static call conversion first and go from there.

-- 
paul-moore.com