[RFC PATCH v1 04/10] selftests/landlock: Create 'socket_access_rights' test
Ivanov Mikhail
ivanov.mikhail1 at huawei-partners.com
Mon Apr 8 09:39:21 UTC 2024
Add test that checks possibility of adding rule with every possible
access right.
Signed-off-by: Ivanov Mikhail <ivanov.mikhail1 at huawei-partners.com>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze at huawei.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
index 525f4f7df..7f31594bf 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
@@ -194,4 +194,33 @@ TEST_F(protocol, create)
test_socket_create(_metadata, &self->srv0, true);
}
+TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights)
+{
+ const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
+ .handled_access_socket = ACCESS_ALL,
+ };
+ struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = {
+ .domain = self->srv0.protocol.domain,
+ .type = self->srv0.protocol.type,
+ };
+ int ruleset_fd;
+ __u64 access;
+
+ ruleset_fd =
+ landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
+ ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
+
+ for (access = 1; access <= ACCESS_LAST; access <<= 1) {
+ protocol.allowed_access = access;
+ EXPECT_EQ(0,
+ landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET,
+ &protocol, 0))
+ {
+ TH_LOG("Failed to add rule with access 0x%llx: %s",
+ access, strerror(errno));
+ }
+ }
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
+}
+
TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
2.34.1
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list