[PATCH 08/11] kernel: pid_namespace: simplify sysctls with register_sysctl()

Luis Chamberlain mcgrof at kernel.org
Fri Mar 10 07:00:50 UTC 2023


On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 08:14:33PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 02:11:27PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 03:13:54PM -0800, Jeff Xu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 12:28 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >  kernel/pid_sysctl.h    | 3 +--
> > > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > Acked-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu at google.com>
> > 
> > Andrew, kernel/pid_sysctl.h is new, not on v6.3-rc1 and so I cannot
> > carry this on sysctl-next. Can you carry this patch on your tree?
> > 
> > I see Eric Biggers already took in the fs-verity patch, so I will drop
> > that from my queue.
> > 
> > I can take the rest in this series.
> > 
> > I will also hold off on the last patch which deprecates the routine
> > register_sysctl_paths() until after say the first part of the merge
> > window.
> > 
> > This will allow all of our trees to work on linux-next without conflict.
> > 
> > Let me know if this is OK with you and Eric!
> > 
> 
> That's fine with me.  I applied the fsverity patch based on your cover letter
> that said it was okay
> (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302202826.776286-1-mcgrof@kernel.org).

Yeah it perfectly fine!

> If you'd
> like to take all the patches so that you can remove register_sysctl_paths() in
> the same cycle, that would be fine too; it's up to you.

Nah it's fine, no rush in this. One small step at a time.

  Luis



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list