[PATCH 0/1] process attribute support for Landlock
enlightened at chromium.org
enlightened at chromium.org
Thu Mar 2 18:52:56 UTC 2023
From: Shervin Oloumi <enlightened at chromium.org>
Hi Mickaël,
I'm looking into adding a simple process attribute getter to Landlock so
we can determine the sand-boxing state of each process based on
/proc/[PID]/attr/current. As ChromeOS is expanding Landlock support,
this would help us paint a clear picture of Landlock coverage in the
fleet. I prepared a patch as a starting point, and would love to get
your feedback.
One area I am not very sure of is the case where more than one LSM is in
use. In such cases each LSM could have its own process attribute
getters and setters. What I learned is that when this is the case, the
kernel only calls the hook function for the LSM that is loaded first in
the CONFIG_LSM option. For example if landlock comes first
(CONFIG_LSM=landlock,...), then the kernel only calls the hook function
for Landlock, when the userspace interacts with process attribute files.
This is not a blocker for us, as we only currently care about reading
the Landlock related attributes, and my understanding is that this is
working as intended, but wanted to get your input.
Shervin Oloumi (1):
lsm: adds process attribute getter for Landlock
fs/proc/base.c | 11 +++++++++++
security/landlock/fs.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
base-commit: e2ca6ba6ba0152361aa4fcbf6067db71b2c7a770
--
2.39.2.722.g9855ee24e9-goog
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list