[PATCH v2 3/5] security: Replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls
Casey Schaufler
casey at schaufler-ca.com
Fri Jun 16 01:05:03 UTC 2023
On 6/15/2023 5:04 PM, KP Singh wrote:
> LSM hooks are currently invoked from a linked list as indirect calls
> which are invoked using retpolines as a mitigation for speculative
> attacks (Branch History / Target injection) and add extra overhead which
> is especially bad in kernel hot paths:
>
> security_file_ioctl:
> 0xffffffff814f0320 <+0>: endbr64
> 0xffffffff814f0324 <+4>: push %rbp
> 0xffffffff814f0325 <+5>: push %r15
> 0xffffffff814f0327 <+7>: push %r14
> 0xffffffff814f0329 <+9>: push %rbx
> 0xffffffff814f032a <+10>: mov %rdx,%rbx
> 0xffffffff814f032d <+13>: mov %esi,%ebp
> 0xffffffff814f032f <+15>: mov %rdi,%r14
> 0xffffffff814f0332 <+18>: mov $0xffffffff834a7030,%r15
> 0xffffffff814f0339 <+25>: mov (%r15),%r15
> 0xffffffff814f033c <+28>: test %r15,%r15
> 0xffffffff814f033f <+31>: je 0xffffffff814f0358 <security_file_ioctl+56>
> 0xffffffff814f0341 <+33>: mov 0x18(%r15),%r11
> 0xffffffff814f0345 <+37>: mov %r14,%rdi
> 0xffffffff814f0348 <+40>: mov %ebp,%esi
> 0xffffffff814f034a <+42>: mov %rbx,%rdx
>
> 0xffffffff814f034d <+45>: call 0xffffffff81f742e0 <__x86_indirect_thunk_array+352>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Indirect calls that use retpolines leading to overhead, not just due
> to extra instruction but also branch misses.
>
> 0xffffffff814f0352 <+50>: test %eax,%eax
> 0xffffffff814f0354 <+52>: je 0xffffffff814f0339 <security_file_ioctl+25>
> 0xffffffff814f0356 <+54>: jmp 0xffffffff814f035a <security_file_ioctl+58>
> 0xffffffff814f0358 <+56>: xor %eax,%eax
> 0xffffffff814f035a <+58>: pop %rbx
> 0xffffffff814f035b <+59>: pop %r14
> 0xffffffff814f035d <+61>: pop %r15
> 0xffffffff814f035f <+63>: pop %rbp
> 0xffffffff814f0360 <+64>: jmp 0xffffffff81f747c4 <__x86_return_thunk>
>
> The indirect calls are not really needed as one knows the addresses of
> enabled LSM callbacks at boot time and only the order can possibly
> change at boot time with the lsm= kernel command line parameter.
>
> An array of static calls is defined per LSM hook and the static calls
> are updated at boot time once the order has been determined.
>
> A static key guards whether an LSM static call is enabled or not,
> without this static key, for LSM hooks that return an int, the presence
> of the hook that returns a default value can create side-effects which
> has resulted in bugs [1].
>
> With the hook now exposed as a static call, one can see that the
> retpolines are no longer there and the LSM callbacks are invoked
> directly:
>
> security_file_ioctl:
> 0xffffffff818f0ca0 <+0>: endbr64
> 0xffffffff818f0ca4 <+4>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
> 0xffffffff818f0ca9 <+9>: push %rbp
> 0xffffffff818f0caa <+10>: push %r14
> 0xffffffff818f0cac <+12>: push %rbx
> 0xffffffff818f0cad <+13>: mov %rdx,%rbx
> 0xffffffff818f0cb0 <+16>: mov %esi,%ebp
> 0xffffffff818f0cb2 <+18>: mov %rdi,%r14
> 0xffffffff818f0cb5 <+21>: jmp 0xffffffff818f0cc7 <security_file_ioctl+39>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Static key enabled for SELinux
>
> 0xffffffff818f0cb7 <+23>: jmp 0xffffffff818f0cde <security_file_ioctl+62>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Static key enabled for BPF LSM. This is something that is changed to
> default to false to avoid the existing side effect issues of BPF LSM
> [1] in a subsequent patch.
>
> 0xffffffff818f0cb9 <+25>: xor %eax,%eax
> 0xffffffff818f0cbb <+27>: xchg %ax,%ax
> 0xffffffff818f0cbd <+29>: pop %rbx
> 0xffffffff818f0cbe <+30>: pop %r14
> 0xffffffff818f0cc0 <+32>: pop %rbp
> 0xffffffff818f0cc1 <+33>: cs jmp 0xffffffff82c00000 <__x86_return_thunk>
> 0xffffffff818f0cc7 <+39>: endbr64
> 0xffffffff818f0ccb <+43>: mov %r14,%rdi
> 0xffffffff818f0cce <+46>: mov %ebp,%esi
> 0xffffffff818f0cd0 <+48>: mov %rbx,%rdx
> 0xffffffff818f0cd3 <+51>: call 0xffffffff81903230 <selinux_file_ioctl>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Direct call to SELinux.
>
> 0xffffffff818f0cd8 <+56>: test %eax,%eax
> 0xffffffff818f0cda <+58>: jne 0xffffffff818f0cbd <security_file_ioctl+29>
> 0xffffffff818f0cdc <+60>: jmp 0xffffffff818f0cb7 <security_file_ioctl+23>
> 0xffffffff818f0cde <+62>: endbr64
> 0xffffffff818f0ce2 <+66>: mov %r14,%rdi
> 0xffffffff818f0ce5 <+69>: mov %ebp,%esi
> 0xffffffff818f0ce7 <+71>: mov %rbx,%rdx
> 0xffffffff818f0cea <+74>: call 0xffffffff8141e220 <bpf_lsm_file_ioctl>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Direct call to BPF LSM.
>
> 0xffffffff818f0cef <+79>: test %eax,%eax
> 0xffffffff818f0cf1 <+81>: jne 0xffffffff818f0cbd <security_file_ioctl+29>
> 0xffffffff818f0cf3 <+83>: jmp 0xffffffff818f0cb9 <security_file_ioctl+25>
> 0xffffffff818f0cf5 <+85>: endbr64
> 0xffffffff818f0cf9 <+89>: mov %r14,%rdi
> 0xffffffff818f0cfc <+92>: mov %ebp,%esi
> 0xffffffff818f0cfe <+94>: mov %rbx,%rdx
> 0xffffffff818f0d01 <+97>: pop %rbx
> 0xffffffff818f0d02 <+98>: pop %r14
> 0xffffffff818f0d04 <+100>: pop %rbp
> 0xffffffff818f0d05 <+101>: ret
> 0xffffffff818f0d06 <+102>: int3
> 0xffffffff818f0d07 <+103>: int3
> 0xffffffff818f0d08 <+104>: int3
> 0xffffffff818f0d09 <+105>: int3
>
> While this patch uses static_branch_unlikely indicating that an LSM hook
> is likely to be not present, a subsequent makes it configurable. In most
> cases this is still a better choice as even when an LSM with one hook is
> added, empty slots are created for all LSM hooks (especially when many
> LSMs that do not initialize most hooks are present on the system).
You could avoid this (I think - some of the macro processing is gnarley)
by keeping the existing list creation in place. You could then create
your arrays based on the number of entries for each hook. The original
list could then be discarded. No empty slots.
On the other hand, I may be missing something obvious.
>
> There are some hooks that don't use the call_int_hook and
> call_void_hook. These hooks are updated to use a new macro called
> security_for_each_hook where the lsm_callback is directly invoked as an
> indirect call. Currently, there are no performance sensitive hooks that
> use the security_for_each_hook macro. However, if, some performance
> sensitive hooks are discovered, these can be updated to use static calls
> with loop unrolling as well using a custom macro.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20220609234601.2026362-1-kpsingh@kernel.org/
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh at kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 70 ++++++++++++--
> security/security.c | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index ab2b2fafa4a4..069da0fa617a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -28,26 +28,77 @@
> #include <linux/security.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/rculist.h>
> +#include <linux/static_call.h>
> +#include <linux/unroll.h>
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/lsm_count.h>
> +
> +#define SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(HOOK, IDX) security_hook_active_##HOOK##_##IDX
> +
> +/*
> + * Identifier for the LSM static calls.
> + * HOOK is an LSM hook as defined in linux/lsm_hookdefs.h
> + * IDX is the index of the static call. 0 <= NUM < MAX_LSM_COUNT
> + */
> +#define LSM_STATIC_CALL(HOOK, IDX) lsm_static_call_##HOOK##_##IDX
> +
> +/*
> + * Call the macro M for each LSM hook MAX_LSM_COUNT times.
> + */
> +#define LSM_LOOP_UNROLL(M, ...) \
> +do { \
> + UNROLL(MAX_LSM_COUNT, M, __VA_ARGS__) \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +#define LSM_DEFINE_UNROLL(M, ...) UNROLL(MAX_LSM_COUNT, M, __VA_ARGS__)
>
> union security_list_options {
> #define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) RET (*NAME)(__VA_ARGS__);
> #include "lsm_hook_defs.h"
> #undef LSM_HOOK
> + void *lsm_callback;
> };
>
> -struct security_hook_heads {
> - #define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) struct hlist_head NAME;
> - #include "lsm_hook_defs.h"
> +/*
> + * @key: static call key as defined by STATIC_CALL_KEY
> + * @trampoline: static call trampoline as defined by STATIC_CALL_TRAMP
> + * @hl: The security_hook_list as initialized by the owning LSM.
> + * @active: Enabled when the static call has an LSM hook associated.
> + */
> +struct lsm_static_call {
> + struct static_call_key *key;
> + void *trampoline;
> + struct security_hook_list *hl;
> + /* this needs to be true or false based on what the key defaults to */
> + struct static_key_false *active;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Table of the static calls for each LSM hook.
> + * Once the LSMs are initialized, their callbacks will be copied to these
> + * tables such that the calls are filled backwards (from last to first).
> + * This way, we can jump directly to the first used static call, and execute
> + * all of them after. This essentially makes the entry point
> + * dynamic to adapt the number of static calls to the number of callbacks.
> + */
> +struct lsm_static_calls_table {
> + #define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \
> + struct lsm_static_call NAME[MAX_LSM_COUNT];
> + #include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
> #undef LSM_HOOK
> } __randomize_layout;
>
> /*
> * Security module hook list structure.
> * For use with generic list macros for common operations.
> + *
> + * struct security_hook_list - Contents of a cacheable, mappable object.
> + * @scalls: The beginning of the array of static calls assigned to this hook.
> + * @hook: The callback for the hook.
> + * @lsm: The name of the lsm that owns this hook.
> */
> struct security_hook_list {
> - struct hlist_node list;
> - struct hlist_head *head;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scalls;
> union security_list_options hook;
> const char *lsm;
> } __randomize_layout;
> @@ -77,10 +128,12 @@ struct lsm_blob_sizes {
> * care of the common case and reduces the amount of
> * text involved.
> */
> -#define LSM_HOOK_INIT(HEAD, HOOK) \
> - { .head = &security_hook_heads.HEAD, .hook = { .HEAD = HOOK } }
> +#define LSM_HOOK_INIT(NAME, CALLBACK) \
> + { \
> + .scalls = static_calls_table.NAME, \
> + .hook = { .NAME = CALLBACK } \
> + }
>
> -extern struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads;
> extern char *lsm_names;
>
> extern void security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
> @@ -118,5 +171,6 @@ extern struct lsm_info __start_early_lsm_info[], __end_early_lsm_info[];
> __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long))
>
> extern int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode);
> +extern struct lsm_static_calls_table static_calls_table __ro_after_init;
>
> #endif /* ! __LINUX_LSM_HOOKS_H */
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index b720424ca37d..9ae7c0ec5cac 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/msg.h>
> #include <net/flow.h>
> +#include <linux/static_call.h>
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
>
> #define MAX_LSM_EVM_XATTR 2
>
> @@ -75,7 +77,6 @@ const char *const lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX + 1] = {
> [LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX] = "confidentiality",
> };
>
> -struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads __ro_after_init;
> static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(blocking_lsm_notifier_chain);
>
> static struct kmem_cache *lsm_file_cache;
> @@ -94,6 +95,43 @@ static __initconst const char *const builtin_lsm_order = CONFIG_LSM;
> static __initdata struct lsm_info **ordered_lsms;
> static __initdata struct lsm_info *exclusive;
>
> +/*
> + * Define static calls and static keys for each LSM hook.
> + */
> +
> +#define DEFINE_LSM_STATIC_CALL(NUM, NAME, RET, ...) \
> + DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(LSM_STATIC_CALL(NAME, NUM), \
> + *((RET(*)(__VA_ARGS__))NULL)); \
> + DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(NAME, NUM));
> +
> +#define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \
> + LSM_DEFINE_UNROLL(DEFINE_LSM_STATIC_CALL, NAME, RET, __VA_ARGS__)
> +#include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
> +#undef LSM_HOOK
> +#undef DEFINE_LSM_STATIC_CALL
> +
> +/*
> + * Initialise a table of static calls for each LSM hook.
> + * DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL invocation above generates a key (STATIC_CALL_KEY)
> + * and a trampoline (STATIC_CALL_TRAMP) which are used to call
> + * __static_call_update when updating the static call.
> + */
> +struct lsm_static_calls_table static_calls_table __ro_after_init = {
> +#define INIT_LSM_STATIC_CALL(NUM, NAME) \
> + (struct lsm_static_call) { \
> + .key = &STATIC_CALL_KEY(LSM_STATIC_CALL(NAME, NUM)), \
> + .trampoline = &STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(LSM_STATIC_CALL(NAME, NUM)),\
> + .active = &SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(NAME, NUM), \
> + },
> +#define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \
> + .NAME = { \
> + LSM_DEFINE_UNROLL(INIT_LSM_STATIC_CALL, NAME) \
> + },
> +#include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
> +#undef LSM_HOOK
> +#undef INIT_LSM_STATIC_CALL
> +};
> +
> static __initdata bool debug;
> #define init_debug(...) \
> do { \
> @@ -154,7 +192,7 @@ static void __init append_ordered_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm, const char *from)
> if (exists_ordered_lsm(lsm))
> return;
>
> - if (WARN(last_lsm == LSM_COUNT, "%s: out of LSM slots!?\n", from))
> + if (WARN(last_lsm == LSM_COUNT, "%s: out of LSM static calls!?\n", from))
> return;
>
> /* Enable this LSM, if it is not already set. */
> @@ -325,6 +363,25 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
> kfree(sep);
> }
>
> +static void __init lsm_static_call_init(struct security_hook_list *hl)
> +{
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall = hl->scalls;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_COUNT; i++) {
> + /* Update the first static call that is not used yet */
> + if (!scall->hl) {
> + __static_call_update(scall->key, scall->trampoline,
> + hl->hook.lsm_callback);
> + scall->hl = hl;
> + static_branch_enable(scall->active);
> + return;
> + }
> + scall++;
> + }
> + panic("%s - Ran out of static slots.\n", __func__);
> +}
> +
> static void __init lsm_early_cred(struct cred *cred);
> static void __init lsm_early_task(struct task_struct *task);
>
> @@ -403,11 +460,6 @@ int __init early_security_init(void)
> {
> struct lsm_info *lsm;
>
> -#define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \
> - INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&security_hook_heads.NAME);
> -#include "linux/lsm_hook_defs.h"
> -#undef LSM_HOOK
> -
> for (lsm = __start_early_lsm_info; lsm < __end_early_lsm_info; lsm++) {
> if (!lsm->enabled)
> lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_true;
> @@ -523,7 +575,7 @@ void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
>
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> hooks[i].lsm = lsm;
> - hlist_add_tail_rcu(&hooks[i].list, hooks[i].head);
> + lsm_static_call_init(&hooks[i]);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -761,29 +813,41 @@ static int lsm_superblock_alloc(struct super_block *sb)
> * call_int_hook:
> * This is a hook that returns a value.
> */
> +#define __CALL_STATIC_VOID(NUM, HOOK, ...) \
> +do { \
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(HOOK, NUM))) { \
> + static_call(LSM_STATIC_CALL(HOOK, NUM))(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } \
> +} while (0);
>
> -#define call_void_hook(FUNC, ...) \
> - do { \
> - struct security_hook_list *P; \
> - \
> - hlist_for_each_entry(P, &security_hook_heads.FUNC, list) \
> - P->hook.FUNC(__VA_ARGS__); \
> +#define call_void_hook(FUNC, ...) \
> + do { \
> + LSM_LOOP_UNROLL(__CALL_STATIC_VOID, FUNC, __VA_ARGS__); \
> } while (0)
>
> -#define call_int_hook(FUNC, IRC, ...) ({ \
> - int RC = IRC; \
> - do { \
> - struct security_hook_list *P; \
> - \
> - hlist_for_each_entry(P, &security_hook_heads.FUNC, list) { \
> - RC = P->hook.FUNC(__VA_ARGS__); \
> - if (RC != 0) \
> - break; \
> - } \
> - } while (0); \
> - RC; \
> +#define __CALL_STATIC_INT(NUM, R, HOOK, LABEL, ...) \
> +do { \
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(HOOK, NUM))) { \
> + R = static_call(LSM_STATIC_CALL(HOOK, NUM))(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + if (R != 0) \
> + goto LABEL; \
> + } \
> +} while (0);
> +
> +#define call_int_hook(FUNC, IRC, ...) \
> +({ \
> + __label__ out; \
> + int RC = IRC; \
> + LSM_LOOP_UNROLL(__CALL_STATIC_INT, RC, FUNC, out, __VA_ARGS__); \
> +out: \
> + RC; \
> })
>
> +#define security_for_each_hook(scall, NAME) \
> + for (scall = static_calls_table.NAME; \
> + scall - static_calls_table.NAME < MAX_LSM_COUNT; scall++) \
> + if (static_key_enabled(&scall->active->key))
> +
As this is a macro that is only used in this file I would much
prefer you not use the "security_" prefix. I think for_each_hook()
or even lsm_for_each_hook() would be preferable.
> /* Security operations */
>
> /**
> @@ -1019,7 +1083,7 @@ int security_settime64(const struct timespec64 *ts, const struct timezone *tz)
> */
> int security_vm_enough_memory_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
> {
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
> int cap_sys_admin = 1;
> int rc;
>
> @@ -1030,8 +1094,8 @@ int security_vm_enough_memory_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
> * agree that it should be set it will. If any module
> * thinks it should not be set it won't.
> */
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.vm_enough_memory, list) {
> - rc = hp->hook.vm_enough_memory(mm, pages);
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, vm_enough_memory) {
> + rc = scall->hl->hook.vm_enough_memory(mm, pages);
> if (rc <= 0) {
> cap_sys_admin = 0;
> break;
> @@ -1169,13 +1233,12 @@ int security_fs_context_dup(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_context *src_fc)
> int security_fs_context_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc,
> struct fs_parameter *param)
> {
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
> int trc;
> int rc = -ENOPARAM;
>
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.fs_context_parse_param,
> - list) {
> - trc = hp->hook.fs_context_parse_param(fc, param);
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, fs_context_parse_param) {
> + trc = scall->hl->hook.fs_context_parse_param(fc, param);
> if (trc == 0)
> rc = 0;
> else if (trc != -ENOPARAM)
> @@ -1538,19 +1601,19 @@ int security_dentry_init_security(struct dentry *dentry, int mode,
> const char **xattr_name, void **ctx,
> u32 *ctxlen)
> {
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
> int rc;
>
> /*
> * Only one module will provide a security context.
> */
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.dentry_init_security,
> - list) {
> - rc = hp->hook.dentry_init_security(dentry, mode, name,
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, dentry_init_security) {
> + rc = scall->hl->hook.dentry_init_security(dentry, mode, name,
> xattr_name, ctx, ctxlen);
> if (rc != LSM_RET_DEFAULT(dentry_init_security))
> return rc;
> }
> +
> return LSM_RET_DEFAULT(dentry_init_security);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_dentry_init_security);
> @@ -2366,7 +2429,7 @@ int security_inode_getsecurity(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> void **buffer, bool alloc)
> {
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
> int rc;
>
> if (unlikely(IS_PRIVATE(inode)))
> @@ -2374,9 +2437,8 @@ int security_inode_getsecurity(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> /*
> * Only one module will provide an attribute with a given name.
> */
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.inode_getsecurity, list) {
> - rc = hp->hook.inode_getsecurity(idmap, inode, name, buffer,
> - alloc);
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, inode_getsecurity) {
> + rc = scall->hl->hook.inode_getsecurity(idmap, inode, name, buffer, alloc);
> if (rc != LSM_RET_DEFAULT(inode_getsecurity))
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -2401,7 +2463,7 @@ int security_inode_getsecurity(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> int security_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> const void *value, size_t size, int flags)
> {
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
> int rc;
>
> if (unlikely(IS_PRIVATE(inode)))
> @@ -2409,9 +2471,8 @@ int security_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> /*
> * Only one module will provide an attribute with a given name.
> */
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.inode_setsecurity, list) {
> - rc = hp->hook.inode_setsecurity(inode, name, value, size,
> - flags);
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, inode_setsecurity) {
> + rc = scall->hl->hook.inode_setsecurity(inode, name, value, size, flags);
> if (rc != LSM_RET_DEFAULT(inode_setsecurity))
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -2485,7 +2546,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up);
> */
> int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
> {
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
> int rc;
>
> /*
> @@ -2493,9 +2554,8 @@ int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
> * xattr), -EOPNOTSUPP if it does not know anything about the xattr or
> * any other error code in case of an error.
> */
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp,
> - &security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up_xattr, list) {
> - rc = hp->hook.inode_copy_up_xattr(name);
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, inode_copy_up_xattr) {
> + rc = scall->hl->hook.inode_copy_up_xattr(name);
> if (rc != LSM_RET_DEFAULT(inode_copy_up_xattr))
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -3375,10 +3435,10 @@ int security_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
> {
> int thisrc;
> int rc = LSM_RET_DEFAULT(task_prctl);
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
>
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.task_prctl, list) {
> - thisrc = hp->hook.task_prctl(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5);
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, task_prctl) {
> + thisrc = scall->hl->hook.task_prctl(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5);
> if (thisrc != LSM_RET_DEFAULT(task_prctl)) {
> rc = thisrc;
> if (thisrc != 0)
> @@ -3775,12 +3835,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_d_instantiate);
> int security_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, const char *lsm,
> const char *name, char **value)
> {
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
>
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.getprocattr, list) {
> - if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsm))
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, getprocattr) {
> + if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, scall->hl->lsm))
> continue;
> - return hp->hook.getprocattr(p, name, value);
> + return scall->hl->hook.getprocattr(p, name, value);
> }
> return LSM_RET_DEFAULT(getprocattr);
> }
> @@ -3800,12 +3860,12 @@ int security_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, const char *lsm,
> int security_setprocattr(const char *lsm, const char *name, void *value,
> size_t size)
> {
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
>
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.setprocattr, list) {
> - if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsm))
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, setprocattr) {
> + if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, scall->hl->lsm))
> continue;
> - return hp->hook.setprocattr(name, value, size);
> + return scall->hl->hook.setprocattr(name, value, size);
> }
> return LSM_RET_DEFAULT(setprocattr);
> }
> @@ -3857,15 +3917,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_ismaclabel);
> */
> int security_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
> {
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
> int rc;
>
> /*
> * Currently, only one LSM can implement secid_to_secctx (i.e this
> * LSM hook is not "stackable").
> */
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secid_to_secctx, list) {
> - rc = hp->hook.secid_to_secctx(secid, secdata, seclen);
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, secid_to_secctx) {
> + rc = scall->hl->hook.secid_to_secctx(secid, secdata, seclen);
> if (rc != LSM_RET_DEFAULT(secid_to_secctx))
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -4901,7 +4961,7 @@ int security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x,
> struct xfrm_policy *xp,
> const struct flowi_common *flic)
> {
> - struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + struct lsm_static_call *scall;
> int rc = LSM_RET_DEFAULT(xfrm_state_pol_flow_match);
>
> /*
> @@ -4913,9 +4973,8 @@ int security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x,
> * For speed optimization, we explicitly break the loop rather than
> * using the macro
> */
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.xfrm_state_pol_flow_match,
> - list) {
> - rc = hp->hook.xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, xp, flic);
> + security_for_each_hook(scall, xfrm_state_pol_flow_match) {
> + rc = scall->hl->hook.xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, xp, flic);
> break;
> }
> return rc;
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list