[PATCH v3 02/57] apparmor: Free up __cleanup() name

[John Johansen]

On 6/12/23 02:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> In order to use __cleanup for __attribute__((__cleanup__(func))) the
> name must not be used for anything else. Avoid the conflict.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz at infradead.org>

if you want, I can just pull this small change into the apparmor
tree so you don't have to carry it anymore as part of the series.

> ---
>   security/apparmor/include/lib.h |    6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/security/apparmor/include/lib.h
> +++ b/security/apparmor/include/lib.h
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ void aa_policy_destroy(struct aa_policy
>    */
>   #define fn_label_build(L, P, GFP, FN)					\
>   ({									\
> -	__label__ __cleanup, __done;					\
> +	__label__ __do_cleanup, __done;					\
>   	struct aa_label *__new_;					\
>   									\
>   	if ((L)->size > 1) {						\
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ void aa_policy_destroy(struct aa_policy
>   			__new_ = (FN);					\
>   			AA_BUG(!__new_);				\
>   			if (IS_ERR(__new_))				\
> -				goto __cleanup;				\
> +				goto __do_cleanup;			\
>   			__lvec[__j++] = __new_;				\
>   		}							\
>   		for (__j = __count = 0; __j < (L)->size; __j++)		\
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ void aa_policy_destroy(struct aa_policy
>   			vec_cleanup(profile, __pvec, __count);		\
>   		} else							\
>   			__new_ = NULL;					\
> -__cleanup:								\
> +__do_cleanup:								\
>   		vec_cleanup(label, __lvec, (L)->size);			\
>   	} else {							\
>   		(P) = labels_profile(L);				\
> 
>