[PATCH v12 01/11] LSM: Identify modules by more than name
Mickaël Salaün
mic at digikod.net
Tue Jul 11 15:35:34 UTC 2023
On 29/06/2023 21:55, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Create a struct lsm_id to contain identifying information
> about Linux Security Modules (LSMs). At inception this contains
> the name of the module, an identifier associated with the security
> module and an integer member "attrs" which identifies the API
> related data associated with each security module. The initial set
> of features maps to information that has traditionaly been available
> in /proc/self/attr. They are documented in a new userspace-api file.
> Change the security_add_hooks() interface to use this structure.
> Change the individual modules to maintain their own struct lsm_id
> and pass it to security_add_hooks().
>
> The values are for LSM identifiers are defined in a new UAPI
> header file linux/lsm.h. Each existing LSM has been updated to
> include it's LSMID in the lsm_id.
>
> The LSM ID values are sequential, with the oldest module
> LSM_ID_CAPABILITY being the lowest value and the existing modules
> numbered in the order they were included in the main line kernel.
> This is an arbitrary convention for assigning the values, but
> none better presents itself. The value 0 is defined as being invalid.
> The values 1-99 are reserved for any special case uses which may
> arise in the future. This may include attributes of the LSM
> infrastructure itself, possibly related to namespacing or network
> attribute management. A special range is identified for such attributes
> to help reduce confusion for developers unfamiliar with LSMs.
>
> LSM attribute values are defined for the attributes presented by
> modules that are available today. As with the LSM IDs, The value 0
> is defined as being invalid. The values 1-99 are reserved for any
> special case uses which may arise in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>
> Cc: linux-security-module <linux-security-module at vger.kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge at hallyn.com>
With the constification:
Reviewed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic at digikod.net>
> ---
> Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst | 1 +
> Documentation/userspace-api/lsm.rst | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 16 +++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/lsm.h | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> security/apparmor/lsm.c | 8 +++-
> security/bpf/hooks.c | 9 ++++-
> security/commoncap.c | 8 +++-
> security/landlock/cred.c | 2 +-
> security/landlock/fs.c | 2 +-
> security/landlock/ptrace.c | 2 +-
> security/landlock/setup.c | 6 +++
> security/landlock/setup.h | 1 +
> security/loadpin/loadpin.c | 9 ++++-
> security/lockdown/lockdown.c | 8 +++-
> security/safesetid/lsm.c | 9 ++++-
> security/security.c | 12 +++---
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 9 ++++-
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 8 +++-
> security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c | 9 ++++-
> security/yama/yama_lsm.c | 8 +++-
> 21 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/userspace-api/lsm.rst
> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
> index 72a65db0c498..b5fa29c077eb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ place where this information is gathered.
> sysfs-platform_profile
> vduse
> futex2
> + lsm
>
> .. only:: subproject and html
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/lsm.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/lsm.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6ddf5506110b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/lsm.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +.. Copyright (C) 2022 Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>
> +.. Copyright (C) 2022 Intel Corporation
> +
> +=====================================
> +Linux Security Modules
> +=====================================
> +
> +:Author: Casey Schaufler
> +:Date: November 2022
You might want to update this date.
> +
> +Linux security modules (LSM) provide a mechanism to implement
> +additional access controls to the Linux security policies.
> +
> +The various security modules may support any of these attributes:
> +
> +``LSM_ATTR_CURRENT`` is the current, active security context of the
> +process.
> +The proc filesystem provides this value in ``/proc/self/attr/current``.
> +This is supported by the SELinux, Smack and AppArmor security modules.
> +Smack also provides this value in ``/proc/self/attr/smack/current``.
> +AppArmor also provides this value in ``/proc/self/attr/apparmor/current``.
> +
> +``LSM_ATTR_EXEC`` is the security context of the process at the time the
> +current image was executed.
> +The proc filesystem provides this value in ``/proc/self/attr/exec``.
> +This is supported by the SELinux and AppArmor security modules.
> +AppArmor also provides this value in ``/proc/self/attr/apparmor/exec``.
> +
> +``LSM_ATTR_FSCREATE`` is the security context of the process used when
> +creating file system objects.
> +The proc filesystem provides this value in ``/proc/self/attr/fscreate``.
> +This is supported by the SELinux security module.
> +
> +``LSM_ATTR_KEYCREATE`` is the security context of the process used when
> +creating key objects.
> +The proc filesystem provides this value in ``/proc/self/attr/keycreate``.
> +This is supported by the SELinux security module.
> +
> +``LSM_ATTR_PREV`` is the security context of the process at the time the
> +current security context was set.
> +The proc filesystem provides this value in ``/proc/self/attr/prev``.
> +This is supported by the SELinux and AppArmor security modules.
> +AppArmor also provides this value in ``/proc/self/attr/apparmor/prev``.
> +
> +``LSM_ATTR_SOCKCREATE`` is the security context of the process used when
> +creating socket objects.
> +The proc filesystem provides this value in ``/proc/self/attr/sockcreate``.
> +This is supported by the SELinux security module.
> +
> +Additional documentation
> +========================
> +
> +* Documentation/security/lsm.rst
> +* Documentation/security/lsm-development.rst
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 35e19594640d..92911df464da 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -19007,6 +19007,7 @@ S: Supported
> W: http://kernsec.org/
> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm.git
> F: security/
> +F: include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
> X: security/selinux/
>
> SELINUX SECURITY MODULE
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index ab2b2fafa4a4..fba8881d2bb5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,18 @@ struct security_hook_heads {
> #undef LSM_HOOK
> } __randomize_layout;
>
> +/**
> + * struct lsm_id - Identify a Linux Security Module.
> + * @lsm: name of the LSM, must be approved by the LSM maintainers
> + * @id: LSM ID number from uapi/linux/lsm.h
> + *
> + * Contains the information that identifies the LSM.
> + */
> +struct lsm_id {
> + const char *name;
> + u64 id;
> +};
> +
> /*
> * Security module hook list structure.
> * For use with generic list macros for common operations.
> @@ -49,7 +61,7 @@ struct security_hook_list {
> struct hlist_node list;
> struct hlist_head *head;
> union security_list_options hook;
> - const char *lsm;
> + struct lsm_id *lsmid;
We should use `const struct lsm_id` here.
> } __randomize_layout;
>
> /*
> @@ -84,7 +96,7 @@ extern struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads;
> extern char *lsm_names;
>
> extern void security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
> - const char *lsm);
> + struct lsm_id *lsmid);
const struct lsm_id *lsmid
>
> #define LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR BIT(0)
> #define LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE BIT(1)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h b/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f27c9a9cc376
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> +/*
> + * Linux Security Modules (LSM) - User space API
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_LSM_H
> +#define _UAPI_LINUX_LSM_H
> +
> +/*
> + * ID tokens to identify Linux Security Modules (LSMs)
> + *
> + * These token values are used to uniquely identify specific LSMs
> + * in the kernel as well as in the kernel's LSM userspace API.
> + *
> + * A value of zero/0 is considered undefined and should not be used
> + * outside the kernel. Values 1-99 are reserved for potential
> + * future use.
> + */
> +#define LSM_ID_UNDEF 0
> +#define LSM_ID_CAPABILITY 100
> +#define LSM_ID_SELINUX 101
> +#define LSM_ID_SMACK 102
> +#define LSM_ID_TOMOYO 103
> +#define LSM_ID_IMA 104
> +#define LSM_ID_APPARMOR 105
> +#define LSM_ID_YAMA 106
> +#define LSM_ID_LOADPIN 107
> +#define LSM_ID_SAFESETID 108
> +#define LSM_ID_LOCKDOWN 109
> +#define LSM_ID_BPF 110
> +#define LSM_ID_LANDLOCK 111
> +
> +/*
> + * LSM_ATTR_XXX definitions identify different LSM attributes
> + * which are used in the kernel's LSM userspace API. Support
> + * for these attributes vary across the different LSMs. None
> + * are required.
> + *
> + * A value of zero/0 is considered undefined and should not be used
> + * outside the kernel. Values 1-99 are reserved for potential
> + * future use.
> + */
> +#define LSM_ATTR_UNDEF 0
> +#define LSM_ATTR_CURRENT 100
> +#define LSM_ATTR_EXEC 101
> +#define LSM_ATTR_FSCREATE 102
> +#define LSM_ATTR_KEYCREATE 103
> +#define LSM_ATTR_PREV 104
> +#define LSM_ATTR_SOCKCREATE 105
> +
> +#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_LSM_H */
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> index f431251ffb91..308cb3a281c3 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <linux/zstd.h>
> #include <net/sock.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/mount.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>
> #include "include/apparmor.h"
> #include "include/apparmorfs.h"
> @@ -1215,6 +1216,11 @@ struct lsm_blob_sizes apparmor_blob_sizes __ro_after_init = {
> .lbs_task = sizeof(struct aa_task_ctx),
> };
>
> +static struct lsm_id apparmor_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
const struct lsm_id apparmor_lsmid = {
> + .name = "apparmor",
> + .id = LSM_ID_APPARMOR,
> +};
> +
> static struct security_hook_list apparmor_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_access_check, apparmor_ptrace_access_check),
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_traceme, apparmor_ptrace_traceme),
> @@ -1904,7 +1910,7 @@ static int __init apparmor_init(void)
> goto buffers_out;
> }
> security_add_hooks(apparmor_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(apparmor_hooks),
> - "apparmor");
> + &apparmor_lsmid);
>
> /* Report that AppArmor successfully initialized */
> apparmor_initialized = 1;
> diff --git a/security/bpf/hooks.c b/security/bpf/hooks.c
> index cfaf1d0e6a5f..7e7bdc1b7979 100644
> --- a/security/bpf/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/bpf/hooks.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> */
> #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> #include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>
> static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> #define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \
> @@ -15,9 +16,15 @@ static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_free, bpf_task_storage_free),
> };
>
> +static struct lsm_id bpf_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
const struct lsm_id bpf_lsmid = {
Ditto for all other struct lsm_id variables.
> + .name = "bpf",
> + .id = LSM_ID_BPF,
> +};
> +
> static int __init bpf_lsm_init(void)
> {
> - security_add_hooks(bpf_lsm_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_lsm_hooks), "bpf");
> + security_add_hooks(bpf_lsm_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_lsm_hooks),
> + &bpf_lsmid);
> pr_info("LSM support for eBPF active\n");
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
> index 0b3fc2f3afe7..44c2577105f7 100644
> --- a/security/commoncap.c
> +++ b/security/commoncap.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include <linux/binfmts.h>
> #include <linux/personality.h>
> #include <linux/mnt_idmapping.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>
> /*
> * If a non-root user executes a setuid-root binary in
> @@ -1440,6 +1441,11 @@ int cap_mmap_file(struct file *file, unsigned long reqprot,
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
>
> +static struct lsm_id capability_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
> + .name = "capability",
> + .id = LSM_ID_CAPABILITY,
> +};
> +
> static struct security_hook_list capability_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(capable, cap_capable),
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(settime, cap_settime),
> @@ -1464,7 +1470,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list capability_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> static int __init capability_init(void)
> {
> security_add_hooks(capability_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(capability_hooks),
> - "capability");
> + &capability_lsmid);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/security/landlock/cred.c b/security/landlock/cred.c
> index 13dff2a31545..786af18c4a1c 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/cred.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/cred.c
> @@ -42,5 +42,5 @@ static struct security_hook_list landlock_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> __init void landlock_add_cred_hooks(void)
> {
> security_add_hooks(landlock_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(landlock_hooks),
> - LANDLOCK_NAME);
> + &landlock_lsmid);
> }
> diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
> index 1c0c198f6fdb..db5ebecfbf02 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/fs.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
> @@ -1307,5 +1307,5 @@ static struct security_hook_list landlock_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> __init void landlock_add_fs_hooks(void)
> {
> security_add_hooks(landlock_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(landlock_hooks),
> - LANDLOCK_NAME);
> + &landlock_lsmid);
> }
> diff --git a/security/landlock/ptrace.c b/security/landlock/ptrace.c
> index 8a06d6c492bf..2bfc533d36e4 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/ptrace.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/ptrace.c
> @@ -116,5 +116,5 @@ static struct security_hook_list landlock_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> __init void landlock_add_ptrace_hooks(void)
> {
> security_add_hooks(landlock_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(landlock_hooks),
> - LANDLOCK_NAME);
> + &landlock_lsmid);
> }
> diff --git a/security/landlock/setup.c b/security/landlock/setup.c
> index 0f6113528fa4..f5ec82a1c381 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/setup.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/setup.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>
> #include "common.h"
> #include "cred.h"
> @@ -24,6 +25,11 @@ struct lsm_blob_sizes landlock_blob_sizes __ro_after_init = {
> .lbs_superblock = sizeof(struct landlock_superblock_security),
> };
>
> +struct lsm_id landlock_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
> + .name = LANDLOCK_NAME,
> + .id = LSM_ID_LANDLOCK,
> +};
> +
> static int __init landlock_init(void)
> {
> landlock_add_cred_hooks();
> diff --git a/security/landlock/setup.h b/security/landlock/setup.h
> index 1daffab1ab4b..38bce5b172dc 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/setup.h
> +++ b/security/landlock/setup.h
> @@ -14,5 +14,6 @@
> extern bool landlock_initialized;
>
> extern struct lsm_blob_sizes landlock_blob_sizes;
> +extern struct lsm_id landlock_lsmid;
>
> #endif /* _SECURITY_LANDLOCK_SETUP_H */
> diff --git a/security/loadpin/loadpin.c b/security/loadpin/loadpin.c
> index ebae964f7cc9..14202ee4a362 100644
> --- a/security/loadpin/loadpin.c
> +++ b/security/loadpin/loadpin.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/string_helpers.h>
> #include <linux/dm-verity-loadpin.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/loadpin.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>
> #define VERITY_DIGEST_FILE_HEADER "# LOADPIN_TRUSTED_VERITY_ROOT_DIGESTS"
>
> @@ -208,6 +209,11 @@ static int loadpin_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id, bool contents)
> return loadpin_check(NULL, (enum kernel_read_file_id) id);
> }
>
> +static struct lsm_id loadpin_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
> + .name = "loadpin",
> + .id = LSM_ID_LOADPIN,
> +};
> +
> static struct security_hook_list loadpin_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(sb_free_security, loadpin_sb_free_security),
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(kernel_read_file, loadpin_read_file),
> @@ -259,7 +265,8 @@ static int __init loadpin_init(void)
> if (!register_sysctl("kernel/loadpin", loadpin_sysctl_table))
> pr_notice("sysctl registration failed!\n");
> #endif
> - security_add_hooks(loadpin_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(loadpin_hooks), "loadpin");
> + security_add_hooks(loadpin_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(loadpin_hooks),
> + &loadpin_lsmid);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/security/lockdown/lockdown.c b/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
> index 68d19632aeb7..aa109b5811d9 100644
> --- a/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
> +++ b/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/security.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>
> static enum lockdown_reason kernel_locked_down;
>
> @@ -75,6 +76,11 @@ static struct security_hook_list lockdown_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(locked_down, lockdown_is_locked_down),
> };
>
> +static struct lsm_id lockdown_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
> + .name = "lockdown",
> + .id = LSM_ID_LOCKDOWN,
> +};
> +
> static int __init lockdown_lsm_init(void)
> {
> #if defined(CONFIG_LOCK_DOWN_KERNEL_FORCE_INTEGRITY)
> @@ -83,7 +89,7 @@ static int __init lockdown_lsm_init(void)
> lock_kernel_down("Kernel configuration", LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX);
> #endif
> security_add_hooks(lockdown_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(lockdown_hooks),
> - "lockdown");
> + &lockdown_lsmid);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/security/safesetid/lsm.c b/security/safesetid/lsm.c
> index e806739f7868..24bbab457623 100644
> --- a/security/safesetid/lsm.c
> +++ b/security/safesetid/lsm.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/ptrace.h>
> #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
> #include <linux/security.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
> #include "lsm.h"
>
> /* Flag indicating whether initialization completed */
> @@ -261,6 +262,11 @@ static int safesetid_task_fix_setgroups(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct lsm_id safesetid_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
> + .name = "safesetid",
> + .id = LSM_ID_SAFESETID,
> +};
> +
> static struct security_hook_list safesetid_security_hooks[] = {
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_fix_setuid, safesetid_task_fix_setuid),
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_fix_setgid, safesetid_task_fix_setgid),
> @@ -271,7 +277,8 @@ static struct security_hook_list safesetid_security_hooks[] = {
> static int __init safesetid_security_init(void)
> {
> security_add_hooks(safesetid_security_hooks,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(safesetid_security_hooks), "safesetid");
> + ARRAY_SIZE(safesetid_security_hooks),
> + &safesetid_lsmid);
>
> /* Report that SafeSetID successfully initialized */
> safesetid_initialized = 1;
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index d5ff7ff45b77..e56714ef045a 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -512,17 +512,17 @@ static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result)
> * security_add_hooks - Add a modules hooks to the hook lists.
> * @hooks: the hooks to add
> * @count: the number of hooks to add
> - * @lsm: the name of the security module
> + * @lsmid: the identification information for the security module
> *
> * Each LSM has to register its hooks with the infrastructure.
> */
> void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
> - const char *lsm)
> + struct lsm_id *lsmid)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> - hooks[i].lsm = lsm;
> + hooks[i].lsmid = lsmid;
> hlist_add_tail_rcu(&hooks[i].list, hooks[i].head);
> }
>
> @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
> * and fix this up afterwards.
> */
> if (slab_is_available()) {
> - if (lsm_append(lsm, &lsm_names) < 0)
> + if (lsm_append(lsmid->name, &lsm_names) < 0)
> panic("%s - Cannot get early memory.\n", __func__);
> }
> }
> @@ -3778,7 +3778,7 @@ int security_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, const char *lsm,
> struct security_hook_list *hp;
>
> hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.getprocattr, list) {
> - if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsm))
> + if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsmid->name))
> continue;
> return hp->hook.getprocattr(p, name, value);
> }
> @@ -3803,7 +3803,7 @@ int security_setprocattr(const char *lsm, const char *name, void *value,
> struct security_hook_list *hp;
>
> hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.setprocattr, list) {
> - if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsm))
> + if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsmid->name))
> continue;
> return hp->hook.setprocattr(name, value, size);
> }
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 79b4890e9936..49ec74bc006c 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@
> #include <linux/fsnotify.h>
> #include <linux/fanotify.h>
> #include <linux/io_uring.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>
> #include "avc.h"
> #include "objsec.h"
> @@ -6890,6 +6891,11 @@ static int selinux_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_IO_URING */
>
> +static struct lsm_id selinux_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
> + .name = "selinux",
> + .id = LSM_ID_SELINUX,
> +};
> +
> /*
> * IMPORTANT NOTE: When adding new hooks, please be careful to keep this order:
> * 1. any hooks that don't belong to (2.) or (3.) below,
> @@ -7210,7 +7216,8 @@ static __init int selinux_init(void)
>
> hashtab_cache_init();
>
> - security_add_hooks(selinux_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(selinux_hooks), "selinux");
> + security_add_hooks(selinux_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(selinux_hooks),
> + &selinux_lsmid);
>
> if (avc_add_callback(selinux_netcache_avc_callback, AVC_CALLBACK_RESET))
> panic("SELinux: Unable to register AVC netcache callback\n");
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index 7a3e9ab137d8..cf847cfe5ed8 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> #include <linux/fs_parser.h>
> #include <linux/watch_queue.h>
> #include <linux/io_uring.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
> #include "smack.h"
>
> #define TRANS_TRUE "TRUE"
> @@ -4840,6 +4841,11 @@ struct lsm_blob_sizes smack_blob_sizes __ro_after_init = {
> .lbs_superblock = sizeof(struct superblock_smack),
> };
>
> +static struct lsm_id smack_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
> + .name = "smack",
> + .id = LSM_ID_SMACK,
> +};
> +
> static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_access_check, smack_ptrace_access_check),
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_traceme, smack_ptrace_traceme),
> @@ -5046,7 +5052,7 @@ static __init int smack_init(void)
> /*
> * Register with LSM
> */
> - security_add_hooks(smack_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(smack_hooks), "smack");
> + security_add_hooks(smack_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(smack_hooks), &smack_lsmid);
> smack_enabled = 1;
>
> pr_info("Smack: Initializing.\n");
> diff --git a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
> index 25006fddc964..e2efc94ec481 100644
> --- a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
> +++ b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
> #include "common.h"
>
> /**
> @@ -542,6 +543,11 @@ static void tomoyo_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
> }
> }
>
> +static struct lsm_id tomoyo_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
> + .name = "tomoyo",
> + .id = LSM_ID_TOMOYO,
> +};
> +
> /*
> * tomoyo_security_ops is a "struct security_operations" which is used for
> * registering TOMOYO.
> @@ -595,7 +601,8 @@ static int __init tomoyo_init(void)
> struct tomoyo_task *s = tomoyo_task(current);
>
> /* register ourselves with the security framework */
> - security_add_hooks(tomoyo_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(tomoyo_hooks), "tomoyo");
> + security_add_hooks(tomoyo_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(tomoyo_hooks),
> + &tomoyo_lsmid);
> pr_info("TOMOYO Linux initialized\n");
> s->domain_info = &tomoyo_kernel_domain;
> atomic_inc(&tomoyo_kernel_domain.users);
> diff --git a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> index 2503cf153d4a..31b52685e041 100644
> --- a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/task_work.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>
> #define YAMA_SCOPE_DISABLED 0
> #define YAMA_SCOPE_RELATIONAL 1
> @@ -421,6 +422,11 @@ static int yama_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent)
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static struct lsm_id yama_lsmid __ro_after_init = {
> + .name = "yama",
> + .id = LSM_ID_YAMA,
> +};
> +
> static struct security_hook_list yama_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_access_check, yama_ptrace_access_check),
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_traceme, yama_ptrace_traceme),
> @@ -471,7 +477,7 @@ static inline void yama_init_sysctl(void) { }
> static int __init yama_init(void)
> {
> pr_info("Yama: becoming mindful.\n");
> - security_add_hooks(yama_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(yama_hooks), "yama");
> + security_add_hooks(yama_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(yama_hooks), &yama_lsmid);
> yama_init_sysctl();
> return 0;
> }
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list