[PATCH v2] LSM: SafeSetID: fix UID printed instead of GID

[Micah Morton]

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:37 AM Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn
<aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:30 AM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 2:34 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:13 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 2:50 PM Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn
> > > > <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 8:59 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:44 AM Alexander Mikhalitsyn
> > > > > > <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pr_warn message clearly says that GID should be printed,
> > > > > > > but we have UID there. Let's fix that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Found accidentaly during the work on isolated user namespaces.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > v2: __kuid_val -> __kgid_val
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  security/safesetid/lsm.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm assuming you're going to pick this up Micah?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Paul!
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your review!
> > > > >
> > > > > Gentle ping to Micah Morton :-)
> > > >
> > > > Micah?
> > > >
> > > > The right thing would be for Micah to merge this via the SafeSetID
> > > > tree, however, considering that it's been over a month with no
> > > > response, and this patch looks trivially correct, I can pick this up
> > > > via the LSM tree if we don't see anything from Micah this week.
> > >
> > > Searching through all of the archives on lore I don't see any email
> > > from Micah past August of 2022.  I'll still stick to the plan of
> > > merging this via the LSM tree next week if we don't see any response
> > > from Micah, but beyond this patch we may need to consider the
> > > possibility that Micah has moved on from SafeSetID.

Sorry guys, this is my first time checking my @chromium.org email in a
couple months. I have indeed moved on from being regularly plugged in
to the goings on of the linux-security-module mailing list. @Paul
Moore whatever you think is the best way forward here is good for me,
I can't really make any promises that I'll be checking this mailing
list on a regular basis.

> > >
> > >  * https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=f%3Amortonm%40chromium.org
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> >
> > This fell through the cracks in my inbox last week, but I just went
> > ahead and merged this into lsm/next.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Alex
>
> >
> > After the upcoming merge window closes we'll have to revisit
> > SafeSetID's status as "supported", we might need to demote it to
> > "maintained" or "odd fixes".
> >
> > --
> > paul-moore.com