[PATCH v4] landlock: Clarify documentation for the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER right
Mickaël Salaün
mic at digikod.net
Tue Feb 21 17:22:27 UTC 2023
Perfect, thanks for your perseverance Günther! I've applied it to my
-next tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mic/linux.git/log/?h=next
On 21/02/2023 17:52, Günther Noack wrote:
> Clarify the "refer" documentation by splitting up a big paragraph of text.
>
> - Call out specifically that the denial by default applies to ABI v1 as well.
> - Turn the three additional constraints for link/rename operations
> into bullet points, to give it more structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000 at gmail.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/landlock.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> index f3223f96469..81d09ef9aa5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> @@ -130,21 +130,37 @@ struct landlock_path_beneath_attr {
> * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_BLOCK: Create (or rename or link) a block device.
> * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM: Create (or rename or link) a symbolic link.
> * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER: Link or rename a file from or to a different
> - * directory (i.e. reparent a file hierarchy). This access right is
> - * available since the second version of the Landlock ABI. This is also the
> - * only access right which is always considered handled by any ruleset in
> - * such a way that reparenting a file hierarchy is always denied by default.
> - * To avoid privilege escalation, it is not enough to add a rule with this
> - * access right. When linking or renaming a file, the destination directory
> - * hierarchy must also always have the same or a superset of restrictions of
> - * the source hierarchy. If it is not the case, or if the domain doesn't
> - * handle this access right, such actions are denied by default with errno
> - * set to ``EXDEV``. Linking also requires a ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_*``
> - * access right on the destination directory, and renaming also requires a
> - * ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_*`` access right on the source's (file or
> - * directory) parent. Otherwise, such actions are denied with errno set to
> - * ``EACCES``. The ``EACCES`` errno prevails over ``EXDEV`` to let user space
> - * efficiently deal with an unrecoverable error.
> + * directory (i.e. reparent a file hierarchy).
> + *
> + * This access right is available since the second version of the Landlock
> + * ABI.
> + *
> + * This is the only access right which is denied by default by any ruleset,
> + * even if the right is not specified as handled at ruleset creation time.
> + * The only way to make a ruleset grant this right is to explicitly allow it
> + * for a specific directory by adding a matching rule to the ruleset.
> + *
> + * In particular, when using the first Landlock ABI version, Landlock will
> + * always deny attempts to reparent files between different directories.
> + *
> + * In addition to the source and destination directories having the
> + * %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER access right, the attempted link or rename
> + * operation must meet the following constraints:
> + *
> + * * The reparented file may not gain more access rights in the destination
> + * directory than it previously had in the source directory. If this is
> + * attempted, the operation results in an ``EXDEV`` error.
> + *
> + * * When linking or renaming, the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_*`` right for the
> + * respective file type must be granted for the destination directory.
> + * Otherwise, the operation results in an ``EACCES`` error.
> + *
> + * * When renaming, the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_*`` right for the
> + * respective file type must be granted for the source directory. Otherwise,
> + * the operation results in an ``EACCES`` error.
> + *
> + * If multiple requirements are not met, the ``EACCES`` error code takes
> + * precedence over ``EXDEV``.
> *
> * .. warning::
> *
>
> base-commit: c9c3395d5e3dcc6daee66c6908354d47bf98cb0c
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list