[PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/3] bpf: add mapper macro for bpf_cmd enum

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:37 PM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau at linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On 12/11/23 8:06 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 8:01 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> > <andrii.nakryiko at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> While I can preemptively answer that in the case vmlinux BTF
> >>> is not available it's fine not to parse names and rely on hex.
> >>
> >> It's fine, I can do optional BTF-based parsing, if that's what you prefer.
> >
> > I prefer to keep uapi/bpf.h as-is and use BTF.
> > But I'd like to hear what Daniel's and Martin's preferences are.
>
> I think user will find it useful to have a more readable uapi header file. It

I'd say having numeric values make it more readable, but that's a
separate discussion. I purposefully kept full BPF_-prefixed names
intact for readability, as opposed to what we do for enum bpf_func_id.

> would be nice to keep the current uapi/bpf.h form if there is another solution.

Ok, I'll use BTF, no problem.