[PATCH v9 03/11] proc: Use lsmids instead of lsm names for attrs

Kees Cook keescook at chromium.org
Fri Apr 21 19:21:13 UTC 2023


On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:42:51AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Use the LSM ID number instead of the LSM name to identify which
> security module's attibute data should be shown in /proc/self/attr.
> The security_[gs]etprocattr() functions have been changed to expect
> the LSM ID. The change from a string comparison to an integer comparison
> in these functions will provide a minor performance improvement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list