[PATCH linux-next] smack: lsm: remove the unneeded result variable
Casey Schaufler
casey at schaufler-ca.com
Mon Sep 12 17:00:04 UTC 2022
On 9/12/2022 3:05 AM, cgel.zte at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Xu Panda <xu.panda at zte.com.cn>
>
> Return the value smk_ptrace_rule_check() directly instead of storing it
> in another redundant variable.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci at zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda at zte.com.cn>
Added to https://github.com/cschaufler/smack-next#next.
Thank you.
> ---
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index 16e24a6cdc7c..b6306d71c908 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -497,13 +497,11 @@ static int smack_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *ctp, unsigned int mode)
> */
> static int smack_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *ptp)
> {
> - int rc;
> struct smack_known *skp;
>
> skp = smk_of_task(smack_cred(current_cred()));
>
> - rc = smk_ptrace_rule_check(ptp, skp, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH, __func__);
> - return rc;
> + return smk_ptrace_rule_check(ptp, skp, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH, __func__);
> }
>
> /**
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list