[PATCH v7 01/18] landlock: rename access mask
Mickaël Salaün
mic at digikod.net
Tue Sep 6 08:06:57 UTC 2022
You can improve the subject with "landlock: Make ruleset's access masks
more generic".
Please capitalize all subjects this way.
On 29/08/2022 19:03, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
> To support network type rules, this modification renames ruleset's
> access masks and modifies it's type to access_masks_t. This patch
> adds filesystem helper functions to add and get filesystem mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze at huawei.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v6:
> * Adds a new access_masks_t for struct ruleset.
> * Renames landlock_set_fs_access_mask() to landlock_add_fs_access_mask()
> because it OR values.
> * Makes landlock_add_fs_access_mask() more resilient incorrect values.
> * Refactors landlock_get_fs_access_mask().
>
> Changes since v5:
> * Changes access_mask_t to u32.
> * Formats code with clang-format-14.
>
> Changes since v4:
> * Deletes struct landlock_access_mask.
>
> Changes since v3:
> * Splits commit.
> * Adds get_mask, set_mask helpers for filesystem.
> * Adds new struct landlock_access_mask.
>
> ---
> security/landlock/fs.c | 7 ++++---
> security/landlock/limits.h | 1 +
> security/landlock/ruleset.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> security/landlock/ruleset.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> security/landlock/syscalls.c | 7 ++++---
> 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
[...]
> @@ -177,4 +182,28 @@ static inline void landlock_get_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset)
> refcount_inc(&ruleset->usage);
> }
>
> +/* A helper function to set a filesystem mask. */
> +static inline void
> +landlock_add_fs_access_mask(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> + const access_mask_t fs_access_mask,
> + const u16 layer_level)
> +{
> + access_mask_t fs_mask = fs_access_mask & LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS;
> +
> + /* Should already be checked in sys_landlock_create_ruleset(). */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(fs_access_mask != fs_mask);
> + // TODO: Add tests to check "|=" and not "="
Please add tests as I explained in a previous email.
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list