[PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail

Mickaël Salaün mic at digikod.net
Mon Nov 28 19:44:44 UTC 2022


This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test 
environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or 
something similar?

On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote:
> Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent,
> trace parent return -1 when child== 0
> How to reproduce warning:
> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests
> 
> Signed-off-by: limin <limin100 at huawei.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c
> index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c
> @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace)
>   		/* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent. */
>   		err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent);
>   		ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0);
> +		EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
> +		EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno);
>   		if (variant->domain_child) {
> -			EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
> -			EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno);
>   			EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read);
>   		} else {
> -			EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
>   			EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read);
>   		}
>   		if (ret == 0) {



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list