[PATCH] net: fix memory leak in security_sk_alloc()
wangyufen
wangyufen at huawei.com
Fri Nov 11 10:33:49 UTC 2022
在 2022/11/11 17:52, Wang Yufen 写道:
> kmemleak reports this issue:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff88810b7835c0 (size 32):
> comm "test_progs", pid 270, jiffies 4294969007 (age 1621.315s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 03 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<00000000376cdeab>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0x110
> [<000000003bcdb3b6>] selinux_sk_alloc_security+0x66/0x110
> [<000000003959008f>] security_sk_alloc+0x47/0x80
> [<00000000e7bc6668>] sk_prot_alloc+0xbd/0x1a0
> [<0000000002d6343a>] sk_alloc+0x3b/0x940
> [<000000009812a46d>] unix_create1+0x8f/0x3d0
> [<000000005ed0976b>] unix_create+0xa1/0x150
> [<0000000086a1d27f>] __sock_create+0x233/0x4a0
> [<00000000cffe3a73>] __sys_socket_create.part.0+0xaa/0x110
> [<0000000007c63f20>] __sys_socket+0x49/0xf0
> [<00000000b08753c8>] __x64_sys_socket+0x42/0x50
> [<00000000b56e26b3>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
> [<000000009b4871b8>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> The issue occurs in the following scenarios:
>
> unix_create1()
> sk_alloc()
> sk_prot_alloc()
> security_sk_alloc()
> call_int_hook()
> hlist_for_each_entry()
> entry1->hook.sk_alloc_security
> <-- selinux_sk_alloc_security() succeeded,
> <-- sk->security alloced here.
> entry2->hook.sk_alloc_security
> <-- bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security() failed
> goto out_free;
> ... <-- the sk->security not freed, memleak
>
> To fix, if security_sk_alloc() failed and sk->security not null,
> goto out_free_sec to reclaim resources.
>
> I'm not sure whether this fix makes sense, but if hook lists don't
> support this usage, might need to modify the
> "tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_cgroup.c" test case.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
The Fixes tag is incorrect, change to
Fixes: 69fd337a975c ("bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor")
> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen at huawei.com>
> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> ---
> net/core/sock.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index a3ba035..e457a9d 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -2030,8 +2030,11 @@ static struct sock *sk_prot_alloc(struct proto *prot, gfp_t priority,
> sk = kmalloc(prot->obj_size, priority);
>
> if (sk != NULL) {
sk->sk_security is not initialized, add "sk->sk_security = NULL;" here.
> - if (security_sk_alloc(sk, family, priority))
> + if (security_sk_alloc(sk, family, priority)) {
> + if (sk->sk_security)
> + goto out_free_sec;
> goto out_free;
> + }
>
> if (!try_module_get(prot->owner))
> goto out_free_sec;
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list