[PATCH v3 04/12] landlock: Fix same-layer rule unions
Mickaël Salaün
mic at digikod.net
Fri May 6 16:10:54 UTC 2022
The original behavior was to check if the full set of requested accesses
was allowed by at least a rule of every relevant layer. This didn't
take into account requests for multiple accesses and same-layer rules
allowing the union of these accesses in a complementary way. As a
result, multiple accesses requested on a file hierarchy matching rules
that, together, allowed these accesses, but without a unique rule
allowing all of them, was illegitimately denied. This case should be
rare in practice and it can only be triggered by the path_rename or
file_open hook implementations.
For instance, if, for the same layer, a rule allows execution
beneath /a/b and another rule allows read beneath /a, requesting access
to read and execute at the same time for /a/b should be allowed for this
layer.
This was an inconsistency because the union of same-layer rule accesses
was already allowed if requested once at a time anyway.
This fix changes the way allowed accesses are gathered over a path walk.
To take into account all these rule accesses, we store in a matrix all
layer granting the set of requested accesses, according to the handled
accesses. To avoid heap allocation, we use an array on the stack which
is 2*13 bytes. A following commit bringing the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER
access right will increase this size to reach 112 bytes (2*14*4) in case
of link or rename actions.
Add a new layout1.layer_rule_unions test to check that accesses from
different rules pertaining to the same layer are ORed in a file
hierarchy. Also test that it is not the case for rules from different
layers.
Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic at digikod.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506161102.525323-5-mic@digikod.net
---
Changes since v2:
* Fix commit message about stack size.
* Format with clang-format and rebase.
Changes since v1:
* Add Reviewed-by: Paul Moore.
* Small cosmetic comment cleanup.
---
security/landlock/fs.c | 78 ++++++++++-----
security/landlock/ruleset.h | 2 +
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
index 20953bff8fd5..c5749301b37d 100644
--- a/security/landlock/fs.c
+++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
@@ -207,45 +207,67 @@ find_rule(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
return rule;
}
-static inline layer_mask_t unmask_layers(const struct landlock_rule *const rule,
- const access_mask_t access_request,
- layer_mask_t layer_mask)
+/*
+ * @layer_masks is read and may be updated according to the access request and
+ * the matching rule.
+ *
+ * Returns true if the request is allowed (i.e. relevant layer masks for the
+ * request are empty).
+ */
+static inline bool
+unmask_layers(const struct landlock_rule *const rule,
+ const access_mask_t access_request,
+ layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS])
{
size_t layer_level;
+ if (!access_request || !layer_masks)
+ return true;
if (!rule)
- return layer_mask;
+ return false;
/*
* An access is granted if, for each policy layer, at least one rule
- * encountered on the pathwalk grants the requested accesses,
- * regardless of their position in the layer stack. We must then check
+ * encountered on the pathwalk grants the requested access,
+ * regardless of its position in the layer stack. We must then check
* the remaining layers for each inode, from the first added layer to
- * the last one.
+ * the last one. When there is multiple requested accesses, for each
+ * policy layer, the full set of requested accesses may not be granted
+ * by only one rule, but by the union (binary OR) of multiple rules.
+ * E.g. /a/b <execute> + /a <read> => /a/b <execute + read>
*/
for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < rule->num_layers; layer_level++) {
const struct landlock_layer *const layer =
&rule->layers[layer_level];
const layer_mask_t layer_bit = BIT_ULL(layer->level - 1);
+ const unsigned long access_req = access_request;
+ unsigned long access_bit;
+ bool is_empty;
- /* Checks that the layer grants access to the full request. */
- if ((layer->access & access_request) == access_request) {
- layer_mask &= ~layer_bit;
-
- if (layer_mask == 0)
- return layer_mask;
+ /*
+ * Records in @layer_masks which layer grants access to each
+ * requested access.
+ */
+ is_empty = true;
+ for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(*layer_masks)) {
+ if (layer->access & BIT_ULL(access_bit))
+ (*layer_masks)[access_bit] &= ~layer_bit;
+ is_empty = is_empty && !(*layer_masks)[access_bit];
}
+ if (is_empty)
+ return true;
}
- return layer_mask;
+ return false;
}
static int check_access_path(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
const struct path *const path,
const access_mask_t access_request)
{
- bool allowed = false;
+ layer_mask_t layer_masks[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS] = {};
+ bool allowed = false, has_access = false;
struct path walker_path;
- layer_mask_t layer_mask;
size_t i;
if (!access_request)
@@ -265,13 +287,20 @@ static int check_access_path(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
return -EACCES;
/* Saves all layers handling a subset of requested accesses. */
- layer_mask = 0;
for (i = 0; i < domain->num_layers; i++) {
- if (domain->fs_access_masks[i] & access_request)
- layer_mask |= BIT_ULL(i);
+ const unsigned long access_req = access_request;
+ unsigned long access_bit;
+
+ for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(layer_masks)) {
+ if (domain->fs_access_masks[i] & BIT_ULL(access_bit)) {
+ layer_masks[access_bit] |= BIT_ULL(i);
+ has_access = true;
+ }
+ }
}
/* An access request not handled by the domain is allowed. */
- if (layer_mask == 0)
+ if (!has_access)
return 0;
walker_path = *path;
@@ -283,14 +312,11 @@ static int check_access_path(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
while (true) {
struct dentry *parent_dentry;
- layer_mask =
- unmask_layers(find_rule(domain, walker_path.dentry),
- access_request, layer_mask);
- if (layer_mask == 0) {
+ allowed = unmask_layers(find_rule(domain, walker_path.dentry),
+ access_request, &layer_masks);
+ if (allowed)
/* Stops when a rule from each layer grants access. */
- allowed = true;
break;
- }
jump_up:
if (walker_path.dentry == walker_path.mnt->mnt_root) {
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
index 521af2848951..d43231b783e4 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
typedef u16 access_mask_t;
/* Makes sure all filesystem access rights can be stored. */
static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(access_mask_t) >= LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS);
+/* Makes sure for_each_set_bit() and for_each_clear_bit() calls are OK. */
+static_assert(sizeof(unsigned long) >= sizeof(access_mask_t));
typedef u16 layer_mask_t;
/* Makes sure all layers can be checked. */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
index e13f046a172a..a4fdcda62bde 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
@@ -758,6 +758,113 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout1, ruleset_overlap)
ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(dir_s1d3, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
}
+TEST_F_FORK(layout1, layer_rule_unions)
+{
+ const struct rule layer1[] = {
+ {
+ .path = dir_s1d2,
+ .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
+ },
+ /* dir_s1d3 should allow READ_FILE and WRITE_FILE (O_RDWR). */
+ {
+ .path = dir_s1d3,
+ .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE,
+ },
+ {},
+ };
+ const struct rule layer2[] = {
+ /* Doesn't change anything from layer1. */
+ {
+ .path = dir_s1d2,
+ .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE |
+ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE,
+ },
+ {},
+ };
+ const struct rule layer3[] = {
+ /* Only allows write (but not read) to dir_s1d3. */
+ {
+ .path = dir_s1d2,
+ .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE,
+ },
+ {},
+ };
+ int ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata, ACCESS_RW, layer1);
+
+ ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
+ enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
+
+ /* Checks s1d1 hierarchy with layer1. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_WRONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_RDWR));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+
+ /* Checks s1d2 hierarchy with layer1. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_WRONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_RDWR));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+
+ /* Checks s1d3 hierarchy with layer1. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_WRONLY));
+ /* dir_s1d3 should allow READ_FILE and WRITE_FILE (O_RDWR). */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_RDWR));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+
+ /* Doesn't change anything from layer1. */
+ ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata, ACCESS_RW, layer2);
+ ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
+ enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
+
+ /* Checks s1d1 hierarchy with layer2. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_WRONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_RDWR));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+
+ /* Checks s1d2 hierarchy with layer2. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_WRONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_RDWR));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+
+ /* Checks s1d3 hierarchy with layer2. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_WRONLY));
+ /* dir_s1d3 should allow READ_FILE and WRITE_FILE (O_RDWR). */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_RDWR));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+
+ /* Only allows write (but not read) to dir_s1d3. */
+ ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata, ACCESS_RW, layer3);
+ ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
+ enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
+
+ /* Checks s1d1 hierarchy with layer3. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_WRONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_RDWR));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+
+ /* Checks s1d2 hierarchy with layer3. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_WRONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_RDWR));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+
+ /* Checks s1d3 hierarchy with layer3. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_WRONLY));
+ /* dir_s1d3 should now deny READ_FILE and WRITE_FILE (O_RDWR). */
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_RDWR));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+}
+
TEST_F_FORK(layout1, non_overlapping_accesses)
{
const struct rule layer1[] = {
--
2.35.1
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list