[PATCH v9 06/23] ima: Move arch_policy_entry into ima_namespace

Mimi Zohar zohar at linux.ibm.com
Thu Jan 27 19:42:14 UTC 2022


On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 10:11 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:46:28PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > From: Stefan Berger <stefanb at linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Move the arch_policy_entry pointer into ima_namespace.
> > 
> > When freeing the memory set the pointer to NULL.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb at linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> 
> Only relevant for the initial imans (for now) since it is derived from a
> boot parameter. Maybe mention this in the commit message.

Enabling architecture specific policy rules is based on
CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY.  As the name implies, each architecture is free
to define their own policy rules.  For example on x86, based on the
secure boot mode both measurement and signature verification rules are
defined for the kexec kernel image and kernel modules. Similarly on
powerpc, different measurement and signature verification rules for the
kexec kernel image and kernel modules are defined based on whether
trusted boot, secure boot, or both are enabled [2].

As neither kexec nor loading kernel modules are applicable, the
architecture policy rules are limited to initial imans.

[1] security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c 
[2] arch/powerpc/kernel/ima_arch.c

> 
> Move into struct ima_namespace looks good,
> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner at kernel.org>

Thanks, Christian.

Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.ibm.com>



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list