[PATCH -next 3/5] landlock/selftests: add selftests for chmod and chown
xiujianfeng
xiujianfeng at huawei.com
Sat Aug 27 11:14:30 UTC 2022
Hi,
在 2022/8/23 3:26, Günther Noack 写道:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 07:46:59PM +0800, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
>> +TEST_F_FORK(layout1, unhandled_chmod)
>> +{
>> + const struct rule rules[] = {
>> + {
>> + .path = file2_s3d1,
>> + .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE |
>> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .path = file3_s3d1,
>> + .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE |
>> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE,
>> + },
>> + {},
>> + };
>> + const int ruleset_fd =
>> + create_ruleset(_metadata, ACCESS_RW, rules);
>> +
>> + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
>> + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
>> + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
>> +
>> + ASSERT_EQ(0, test_chmod(file2_s3d1));
>> + ASSERT_EQ(0, test_fchmod(file2_s3d1));
>> + ASSERT_EQ(0, test_chmod(file3_s3d1));
>> + ASSERT_EQ(0, test_chmod(dir_s3d1));
>> +}
>
> I missed it in the previous mail:
>
> There are also the chown variants lchown() and fchownat(), as well as
> the chmod variant fchmodat(), which might be interesting to test,
> especially the symlink scenarios.
>
> fchmodat() has a AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag which does the chmod
> equivalent to lchown().
>
man fchmodat shows as follows:
...
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW
If pathname is a symbolic link, do not dereference it: instead operate
on the link itself. This flag is not currently implemented.
...
so I suppose this can not be test. Please correct me if I am wrong.
thanks.
> --
> .
>
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list