[PATCH v13 05/10] bpf: Add bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put() kfuncs

[Roberto Sassu]

On Fri, 2022-08-26 at 00:25 -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 12:22 AM Roberto Sassu
> <roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 22:56 -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 8:02 AM Roberto Sassu
> > > <roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> > > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Add the bpf_lookup_user_key(), bpf_lookup_system_key() and
> > > > bpf_key_put()
> > > > kfuncs, to respectively search a key with a given key handle
> > > > serial
> > > > number
> > > > and flags, obtain a key from a pre-determined ID defined in
> > > > include/linux/verification.h, and cleanup.
> > > > 
> > > > Introduce system_keyring_id_check() to validate the keyring ID
> > > > parameter of
> > > > bpf_lookup_system_key().
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/linux/bpf.h          |   6 ++
> > > >  include/linux/verification.h |   8 +++
> > > >  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c     | 135
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  3 files changed, 149 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > > index 6041304b402e..991da09a5858 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > > @@ -2586,4 +2586,10 @@ static inline void
> > > > bpf_cgroup_atype_get(u32
> > > > attach_btf_id, int cgroup_atype) {}
> > > >  static inline void bpf_cgroup_atype_put(int cgroup_atype) {}
> > > >  #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_LSM */
> > > > 
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEYS
> > > 
> > > Do we need to declare struct key here?
> > > 
> > > > +struct bpf_key {
> > > > +       struct key *key;
> > > > +       bool has_ref;
> > > > +};
> > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_KEYS */
> > > >  #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
> > > > 
> > 
> > If there is a better place, I will move there.
> 
> I guess you misunderstood. I meant we need
> 
> struct key;
> 
> struct bpf_key {
>        struct key *key;
>        bool has_ref;
> };
> 
> Otherwise, we may get some warning with certain config.

Argh, thanks!

Will add it.

Roberto