[PATCH 0/2] tpm: use SM3 instead of SM3_256

[Tianjia Zhang]

Hi Ken,

On 10/20/21 6:26 AM, Ken Goldman wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/11/2021 3:02 AM, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your attention. This is really tricky. I will contact 
>> trustedcomputinggroup first and give some suggestions, It would be 
>> best if a more standard algorithm name can be used from the source of 
>> the specification.
> 
> This was discussed in the TCG's TPM WG in February, 2020.  At the time,
> someone said that there was a possibility of a 512-bit version in the
> future.
> 
> For TCG members:
> 
> https://members.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wg/TPMWG/mail/thread/61442#136758
> 
> My guess is that, since it's already in many TCG specs and code, TCG
> will want to leave it as is.
> 

I got it. thanks for your information.

Best regards,
Tianjia