[PATCH] lsm: security_task_getsecid_subj() -> security_current_getsecid_subj()

Paul Moore paul at paul-moore.com
Mon Nov 22 23:12:19 UTC 2021


On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 5:52 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:17 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> >
> > The security_task_getsecid_subj() LSM hook invites misuse by allowing
> > callers to specify a task even though the hook is only safe when the
> > current task is referenced.  Fix this by removing the task_struct
> > argument to the hook, requiring LSM implementations to use the
> > current task.  While we are changing the hook declaration we also
> > rename the function to security_current_getsecid_subj() in an effort
> > to reinforce that the hook captures the subjective credentials of the
> > current task and not an arbitrary task on the system.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h         |    3 +--
> >  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h             |    8 +++-----
> >  include/linux/security.h              |    4 ++--
> >  kernel/audit.c                        |    4 ++--
> >  kernel/auditfilter.c                  |    3 +--
> >  kernel/auditsc.c                      |   10 +++++++++-
> >  net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c     |    2 +-
> >  net/netlabel/netlabel_user.h          |    2 +-
> >  security/apparmor/lsm.c               |   13 ++++++++++---
> >  security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c |    2 +-
> >  security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c     |   14 +++++++-------
> >  security/security.c                   |    6 +++---
> >  security/selinux/hooks.c              |   19 +++----------------
> >  security/smack/smack.h                |   16 ----------------
> >  security/smack/smack_lsm.c            |    9 ++++-----
> >  15 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
> I never saw any comments, positive or negative, on this patch so I'll
> plan on merging it early next week.  If you've got objections, now is
> the time to speak up.

I just merged this patch, with the AppArmor tweak suggested by Serge,
into selinux/next.  Thanks everyone.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list