Mark Rutland mark.rutland at arm.com
Tue May 11 13:59:20 UTC 2021

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 03:01:48PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 02:45:03PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:


> > That's 441301 new MOVs, and the equivalent of 442511 new instructions
> > overall. There are 135728 new MOVs to x16 and x17 specifically, which
> > account for ~31% of that.
> I assume the x16/x17 case could be addressed by the compiler if it
> examined the need for PLTs, or is that too late (in the sense that the
> linker is doing that phase)?

Most (all?) PLTs will be created at link time, and IIUC the compiler
simply has to assume any non-static function might have a PLT, since the
AAPCS permits that. Maybe some of the smaller memory size models don't
permit PLTs, but I have no real knowledge of that area and I'm already
out on a limb.

LTO could probably help with visiblity, but otherwise I don't see a way
the compiler could be sure a PLT won't exist.

> Regardless, I will update the documentation on this feature. :)

Great; thanks!


More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list