[PATCH v2 6/6] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP CAAM-based trusted keys
Ahmad Fatoum
a.fatoum at pengutronix.de
Fri Jul 2 08:00:05 UTC 2021
Hello Richard,
On 01.07.21 22:42, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Ahmad,
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> Von: "Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
>> +static struct caam_blob_priv *blobifier;
>> +
>> +#define KEYMOD "kernel:trusted"
>
> I'm still think that hard coding the key modifier is not wise.
> As I said[0], there are folks out there that want to provide their own modifier,
> so it is not only about being binary compatible with other CAAM blob patches in the wild.
I don't think the characterization as a salt is accurate. AFAIU it's more
of a namespace, so blobs being loaded are "type-checked" against the modifier.
> I'll happily implement that feature after your patches got merged but IMHO we should first agree on an interface.
> How about allowing another optional parameter to Opt_new and Opt_load
Sound good to me. pcrlock for TPM trusted keys has the same interface.
I'd prefer the new option to accept strings, not hex though.
> and having a key modifier per struct trusted_key_payload instance?
Ye, possibly a void *backend_data, which other trust sources could leverage
as well. But that should be separate discussion.
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
>
> [0]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-crypto/patch/319e558e1bd19b80ad6447c167a2c3942bdafea2.1615914058.git-series.a.fatoum@pengutronix.de/#24085397
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list