[PATCH v8 2/4] KEYS: trusted: Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys

Thu Jan 21 15:07:39 UTC 2021

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:44:07AM +0100, Jerome Forissier wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/21/21 1:02 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen via OP-TEE wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:53:28PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> >> On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 07:01, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko at kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:32:31AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 07:35, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko at kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 04:47:00PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Jarkko,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 22:05, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko at kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:31:44PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Add support for TEE based trusted keys where TEE provides the functionality
> >>>>>>>>> to seal and unseal trusted keys using hardware unique key.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Refer to Documentation/tee.txt for detailed information about TEE.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg at linaro.org>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I haven't yet got QEMU environment working with aarch64, this produces
> >>>>>>>> just a blank screen:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ./output/host/usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu cortex-a53 -smp 1 -kernel output/images/Image -initrd output/images/rootfs.cpio -serial stdio
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> My BuildRoot fork for TPM and keyring testing is located over here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/buildroot-tpmdd.git/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The "ARM version" is at this point in aarch64 branch. Over time I will
> >>>>>>>> define tpmdd-x86_64 and tpmdd-aarch64 boards and everything will be then
> >>>>>>>> in the master branch.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> To create identical images you just need to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> $ make tpmdd_defconfig && make
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Can you check if you see anything obviously wrong? I'm eager to test this
> >>>>>>>> patch set, and in bigger picture I really need to have ready to run
> >>>>>>>> aarch64 environment available.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I would rather suggest you to follow steps listed here [1] as to test
> >>>>>>> this feature on Qemu aarch64 we need to build firmwares such as TF-A,
> >>>>>>> OP-TEE, UEFI etc. which are all integrated into OP-TEE Qemu build
> >>>>>>> system [2]. And then it would be easier to migrate them to your
> >>>>>>> buildroot environment as well.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/pipermail/op-tee/2020-May/000027.html
> >>>>>>> [2] https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/devices/qemu.html#qemu-v8
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Sumit
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can you provide 'keyctl_change'? Otherwise, the steps are easy to follow.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> $ cat keyctl_change
> >>>>> diff --git a/common.mk b/common.mk
> >>>>> index aeb7b41..663e528 100644
> >>>>> --- a/common.mk
> >>>>> +++ b/common.mk
> >>>>> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ BR2_PACKAGE_OPTEE_TEST_SDK ?= $(OPTEE_OS_TA_DEV_KIT_DIR)
> >>>>>  BR2_PACKAGE_OPTEE_TEST_SITE ?= $(OPTEE_TEST_PATH)
> >>>>>  BR2_PACKAGE_STRACE ?= y
> >>>>>  BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_GETTY_PORT ?= $(if
> >>>>> $(CFG_NW_CONSOLE_UART),ttyAMA$(CFG_NW_CONSOLE_UART),ttyAMA0)
> >>>>> +BR2_PACKAGE_KEYUTILS := y
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  # All BR2_* variables from the makefile or the environment are appended to
> >>>>>  # ../out-br/extra.conf. All values are quoted "..." except y and n.
> >>>>> diff --git a/kconfigs/qemu.conf b/kconfigs/qemu.conf
> >>>>> index 368c18a..832ab74 100644
> >>>>> --- a/kconfigs/qemu.conf
> >>>>> +++ b/kconfigs/qemu.conf
> >>>>> @@ -20,3 +20,5 @@ CONFIG_9P_FS=y
> >>>>>  CONFIG_9P_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
> >>>>>  CONFIG_HW_RANDOM=y
> >>>>>  CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIRTIO=y
> >>>>> +CONFIG_TRUSTED_KEYS=y
> >>>>> +CONFIG_ENCRYPTED_KEYS=y
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> After I've successfully tested 2/4, I'd suggest that you roll out one more
> >>>>>> version and CC the documentation patch to Elaine and Mini, and clearly
> >>>>>> remark in the commit message that TEE is a standard, with a link to the
> >>>>>> specification.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sure, I will roll out the next version after your testing.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks, I'll try this at instant, and give my feedback.
> >>>
> >>> I bump into this:
> >>>
> >>> $ make run-only
> >>> ln -sf /home/jarkko/devel/tpm/optee/build/../out-br/images/rootfs.cpio.gz /home/jarkko/devel/tpm/optee/build/../out/bin/
> >>> ln: failed to create symbolic link '/home/jarkko/devel/tpm/optee/build/../out/bin/': No such file or directory
> >>> make: *** [Makefile:194: run-only] Error 1
> >>>
> >>
> >> Could you check if the following directory tree is built after
> >> executing the below command?
> >>
> >> $ make -j`nproc`
> >> CFG_IN_TREE_EARLY_TAS=trusted_keys/f04a0fe7-1f5d-4b9b-abf7-619b85b4ce8c
> >>
> >> $ tree out/bin/
> >> out/bin/
> >> ├── bl1.bin -> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu/release/bl1.bin
> >> ├── bl2.bin -> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu/release/bl2.bin
> >> ├── bl31.bin ->
> >> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu/release/bl31.bin
> >> ├── bl32.bin ->
> >> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../optee_os/out/arm/core/tee-header_v2.bin
> >> ├── bl32_extra1.bin ->
> >> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../optee_os/out/arm/core/tee-pager_v2.bin
> >> ├── bl32_extra2.bin ->
> >> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../optee_os/out/arm/core/tee-pageable_v2.bin
> >> ├── bl33.bin ->
> >> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../edk2/Build/ArmVirtQemuKernel-AARCH64/RELEASE_GCC49/FV/QEMU_EFI.fd
> >> ├── Image -> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../linux/arch/arm64/boot/Image
> >> └── rootfs.cpio.gz ->
> >> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../out-br/images/rootfs.cpio.gz
> >>
> >> 0 directories, 9 files
> >>
> >> -Sumit
> > 
> > I actually spotted a build error that was unnoticed last time:
> > 
> > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/jarkko/devel/tpm/optee/edk2/BaseTools/Tests'
> > /bin/sh: 1: python: not found
> > 
> > I'd prefer not to install Python2. It has been EOL over a year.
> 
> AFAIK, everything should build fine with Python3. On my Ubuntu 20.04
> machine, this is accomplished by installing package "python-is-python3"
> (after uninstalling "python-is-python2" if need be).
> 
> $ ls -l /usr/bin/python
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Apr 15  2020 /usr/bin/python -> python3

Right, just found about this in unrelated context :-) [*]

Hope this will work out...

[*] https://github.com/surge-synthesizer/surge/pull/3655

/Jarkko