[PATCH v4] certs: Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx entries
David Howells
dhowells at redhat.com
Tue Jan 12 14:57:39 UTC 2021
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg at oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 2020, at 2:49 AM, David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg at oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Add support for EFI_CERT_X509_GUID dbx entries. When a EFI_CERT_X509_GUID
> >> is found, it is added as an asymmetrical key to the .blacklist keyring.
> >> Anytime the .platform keyring is used, the keys in the .blacklist keyring
> >> are referenced, if a matching key is found, the key will be rejected.
> >
> > Ummm... Why this way and not as a blacklist key which takes up less space?
> > I'm guessing that you're using the key chain matching logic. We really only
> > need to blacklist the key IDs.
>
> I implemented it this way so that certs in the dbx would only impact
> the .platform keyring. I was under the impression we didn’t want to have
> Secure Boot UEFI db/dbx certs dictate keyring functionality within the kernel
> itself. Meaning if we have a matching dbx cert in any other keyring (builtin,
> secondary, ima, etc.), it would be allowed. If that is not how you’d like to
> see it done, let me know and I’ll make the change.
I wonder if that is that the right thing to do. I guess this is a policy
decision and may depend on the particular user.
> > Also, what should happen if a revocation cert rejected by the blacklist?
>
> I’m not sure I understand the question. How would it be rejected?
The SHA256 of a revocation cert being loaded could match an
already-blacklisted SHA256 sum, either compiled in or already loaded from
UEFI.
David
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list