[PATCH] LoadPin: Allow filesystem switch when not enforcing

[kernel test robot]

Hi Kees,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on kees/for-next/pstore linus/master v5.12-rc6 next-20210409]
[cannot apply to kees/for-next/loadpin]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Kees-Cook/LoadPin-Allow-filesystem-switch-when-not-enforcing/20210409-073059
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 5e46d1b78a03d52306f21f77a4e4a144b6d31486
config: x86_64-randconfig-a003-20210410 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project dd453a1389b6a7e6d9214b449d3c54981b1a89b6)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/3dc7289d9d15396745929884191874dc2cce1afc
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Kees-Cook/LoadPin-Allow-filesystem-switch-when-not-enforcing/20210409-073059
        git checkout 3dc7289d9d15396745929884191874dc2cce1afc
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> security/loadpin/loadpin.c:106:4: error: use of undeclared identifier 'load_root_writable'
                           load_root_writable ? "writable" : "read-only");
                           ^
>> security/loadpin/loadpin.c:121:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'enforced'; did you mean 'enforce'?
                   if (enforced) {
                       ^~~~~~~~
                       enforce
   security/loadpin/loadpin.c:41:12: note: 'enforce' declared here
   static int enforce = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOADPIN_ENFORCE);
              ^
   2 errors generated.


vim +/load_root_writable +106 security/loadpin/loadpin.c

    96	
    97	static void report_writable(struct block_device *bdev)
    98	{
    99		if (bdev) {
   100			char name[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
   101	
   102			bdevname(bdev, name);
   103			pr_info("%s (%u:%u): %s\n", name,
   104				MAJOR(bdev->bd_dev),
   105				MINOR(bdev->bd_dev),
 > 106				load_root_writable ? "writable" : "read-only");
   107		} else {
   108			pr_info("pinned filesystem lacks block device, treating as: writable\n");
   109		}
   110	}
   111	
   112	static void loadpin_sb_free_security(struct super_block *mnt_sb)
   113	{
   114		/*
   115		 * When unmounting the filesystem we were using for load
   116		 * pinning, we acknowledge the superblock release, but make sure
   117		 * no other modules or firmware can be loaded when we are in
   118		 * enforcing mode. Otherwise, allow the root to be reestablished.
   119		 */
   120		if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pinned_root) && mnt_sb == pinned_root) {
 > 121			if (enforced) {
   122				pinned_root = ERR_PTR(-EIO);
   123				pr_info("umount pinned fs: refusing further loads\n");
   124			} else {
   125				pinned_root = NULL;
   126			}
   127		}
   128	}
   129	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org