[RFC PATCH 1/6] security/fbfam: Add a Kconfig to enable the fbfam feature
John Wood
john.wood at gmx.com
Thu Sep 17 17:32:09 UTC 2020
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:21:58PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:21 PM Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:
> > From: John Wood <john.wood at gmx.com>
> >
> > Add a menu entry under "Security options" to enable the "Fork brute
> > force attack mitigation" feature.
> [...]
> > +config FBFAM
>
> Please give this a more descriptive name than FBFAM. Some name where,
> if a random kernel developer sees an "#ifdef" with that name in some
> random piece of kernel code, they immediately have a rough idea for
> what kind of feature this is.
>
> Perhaps something like THROTTLE_FORK_CRASHES. Or something else that
> is equally descriptive.
Ok, understood. This will be fixed for the next version. Thanks.
> > + bool "Fork brute force attack mitigation"
> > + default n
>
> "default n" is superfluous and should AFAIK be omitted.
Ok. I will remove it. Thanks.
> > + help
> > + This is a user defense that detects any fork brute force attack
> > + based on the application's crashing rate. When this measure is
> > + triggered the fork system call is blocked.
>
> This help text claims that the mitigation will block fork(), but patch
> 6/6 actually kills the process hierarchy.
Sorry, it's a mistake. It was the first idea but finally the implementation
changed and this description not was modified. Apologies. It will be fixed
for the next version.
Thanks,
John Wood
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list