[PATCH V2 2/3] integrity: Move import of MokListRT certs to a separate routine

[Lenny Szubowicz]

On 9/11/20 11:59 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 11:54 -0400, Lenny Szubowicz wrote:
>> On 9/11/20 11:02 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 at 04:31, Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Move the loading of certs from the UEFI MokListRT into a separate
>>>> routine to facilitate additional MokList functionality.
>>>>
>>>> There is no visible functional change as a result of this patch.
>>>> Although the UEFI dbx certs are now loaded before the MokList certs,
>>>> they are loaded onto different key rings. So the order of the keys
>>>> on their respective key rings is the same.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi at redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Why did you drop Mimi's reviewed-by from this patch?
>>
>> It was not intentional. I was just not aware that I needed to propagate
>> Mimi Zohar's reviewed-by from V1 of the patch to V2.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> V2 includes changes in that patch to incorporate suggestions from
>> Andy Shevchenko. My assumption was that the maintainer would
>> gather up the reviewed-by and add any signed-off-by as appropriate,
>> but it sounds like my assumption was incorrect. In retrospect, I
>> could see that having the maintainer dig through prior versions
>> of a patch set for prior reviewed-by tags could be burdensome.
> 
> As much as possible moving code should be done without making changes,
> simpler for code review.   Then as a separate patch you make changes.
> That way you could also have retained my Reviewed-by.
> 
> Mimi

If you or Ard think I should, I can do a V3 with:

   Patch V3 01: Unchanged from V2
   Patch V3 02: Goes back to V1 of patch 02 that Mimi reviewed
   Patch V3 03: New. Has Andy's cleanup suggestions separated from patch 02
   Patch V3 04: This would most probably just be the V2 of patch 03 with no changes

                  -Lenny.

> 
>>
>> Advice on the expected handling of this would be appreciated.
> 
>