[PATCH] security: keys: Use kvfree_sensitive in a few places
Denis Efremov
efremov at linux.com
Fri Sep 11 16:05:16 UTC 2020
Hi,
same patch
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/27/168
Thanks,
Denis
On 9/11/20 2:44 PM, Alex Dewar wrote:
> In big_key.c, there are a few places where memzero_explicit + kvfree is
> used. It is better to use kvfree_sensitive instead, which is more
> readable and also prevents the compiler from eliding the call to
> memzero_explicit. Fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90 at gmail.com>
> ---
> security/keys/big_key.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/keys/big_key.c b/security/keys/big_key.c
> index 691347dea3c1..d17e5f09eeb8 100644
> --- a/security/keys/big_key.c
> +++ b/security/keys/big_key.c
> @@ -121,8 +121,7 @@ int big_key_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
> *path = file->f_path;
> path_get(path);
> fput(file);
> - memzero_explicit(buf, enclen);
> - kvfree(buf);
> + kvfree_sensitive(buf, enclen);
> } else {
> /* Just store the data in a buffer */
> void *data = kmalloc(datalen, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -140,8 +139,7 @@ int big_key_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
> err_enckey:
> kfree_sensitive(enckey);
> error:
> - memzero_explicit(buf, enclen);
> - kvfree(buf);
> + kvfree_sensitive(buf, enclen);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -273,8 +271,7 @@ long big_key_read(const struct key *key, char *buffer, size_t buflen)
> err_fput:
> fput(file);
> error:
> - memzero_explicit(buf, enclen);
> - kvfree(buf);
> + kvfree_sensitive(buf, enclen);
> } else {
> ret = datalen;
> memcpy(buffer, key->payload.data[big_key_data], datalen);
>
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list