[PATCH v39 11/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX enclave driver
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com
Mon Oct 5 11:42:50 UTC 2020
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:45:54AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 04:39:25PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause)
> >
> > You use gpl-only header files in this file, so how in the world can it
> > be bsd-3 licensed?
> >
> > Please get your legal department to agree with this, after you explain
> > to them how you are mixing gpl2-only code in with this file.
> >
> > > +// Copyright(c) 2016-18 Intel Corporation.
> >
> > Dates are hard to get right :(
>
> As is comment formatting apparently. Don't use // comments for anything
> but the SPDX header, please.
I'll bring some context to this.
When I moved into using SPDX, I took the example from places where I saw
also the copyright using "//". That's the reason for the choice.
I.e.
$ git grep "// Copyright" | wc -l
2123
I don't care, which one to use, just wondering is it done in the wrong
way in all these sites?
/Jarkko
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list