[PATCH bpf-next v6 1/8] bpf: Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM

Andrii Nakryiko andrii.nakryiko at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 01:51:50 UTC 2020


On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM KP Singh <kpsingh at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh at google.com>
>
> Introduce types and configs for bpf programs that can be attached to
> LSM hooks. The programs can be enabled by the config option
> CONFIG_BPF_LSM.
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh at google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb at google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest at google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs at fb.com>
> ---

Looks good to me, so please add by ack, but I think it would be easier
to review if this was combined with patch #4, which adds verifier
support and kernel/bpf/syscall.c support. On its own this patch just
adds random unused stuff.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin at fb.com>

>  MAINTAINERS                    |  1 +
>  include/linux/bpf.h            |  3 +++
>  include/linux/bpf_types.h      |  4 ++++
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  2 ++
>  init/Kconfig                   | 12 ++++++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/Makefile            |  1 +
>  kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c           | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c       | 12 ++++++------
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  2 ++
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c  |  1 +
>  10 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
>

[...]



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list