[PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] bpf: lsm: Initialize the BPF LSM hooks
KP Singh
kpsingh at chromium.org
Tue Mar 24 01:53:06 UTC 2020
On 23-Mär 15:12, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:58:18PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > That's not too terrible, I suppose. What would you be thinking for
> > the calls that do use call_int_hook()?
> >
> > rc = call_int_hook(something, something_default, goodnesses);
> >
> > or embedded in the macro:
> >
> > rc = call_int_hook(something, goodnesses);
>
> Oh yes, good point. The hook call already knows the name, so:
>
> #define call_int_hook(FUNC, ...) ({ \
> int RC = FUNC#_default; \
Excellent ideas, I will spin up the next revision with these changes.
- KP
> ...
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
>
>
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list