[PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] bpf: lsm: Initialize the BPF LSM hooks

KP Singh kpsingh at chromium.org
Tue Mar 24 01:53:06 UTC 2020


On 23-Mär 15:12, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:58:18PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > That's not too terrible, I suppose. What would you be thinking for
> > the calls that do use call_int_hook()?
> > 
> > 	rc = call_int_hook(something, something_default, goodnesses);
> > 
> > or embedded in the macro:
> > 
> > 	rc = call_int_hook(something, goodnesses);
> 
> Oh yes, good point. The hook call already knows the name, so:
> 
> #define call_int_hook(FUNC, ...) ({                        \
>         int RC = FUNC#_default;                            \

Excellent ideas, I will spin up the next revision with these changes.

- KP

> ...
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook
> 
> 



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list