[PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] bpf: lsm: Initialize the BPF LSM hooks

[Casey Schaufler]

On 3/23/2020 9:44 AM, KP Singh wrote:
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh at google.com>
>
> The bpf_lsm_ nops are initialized into the LSM framework like any other
> LSM.  Some LSM hooks do not have 0 as their default return value. The
> __weak symbol for these hooks is overridden by a corresponding
> definition in security/bpf/hooks.c
>
> The LSM can be enabled / disabled with CONFIG_LSM.
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh at google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb at google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest at google.com>
> ---
>  security/Kconfig      | 10 ++++----
>  security/Makefile     |  2 ++
>  security/bpf/Makefile |  5 ++++
>  security/bpf/hooks.c  | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 security/bpf/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 security/bpf/hooks.c
>
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
> index 2a1a2d396228..cd3cc7da3a55 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/Kconfig
> @@ -277,11 +277,11 @@ endchoice
>  
>  config LSM
>  	string "Ordered list of enabled LSMs"
> -	default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
> -	default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
> -	default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
> -	default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
> -	default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor"
> +	default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
> +	default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
> +	default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
> +	default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
> +	default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf"
>  	help
>  	  A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order.
>  	  Any LSMs left off this list will be ignored. This can be
> diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile
> index 746438499029..22e73a3482bd 100644
> --- a/security/Makefile
> +++ b/security/Makefile
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA)		+= yama
>  subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOADPIN)	+= loadpin
>  subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SAFESETID)    += safesetid
>  subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM)	+= lockdown
> +subdir-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM)		+= bpf
>  
>  # always enable default capabilities
>  obj-y					+= commoncap.o
> @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOADPIN)		+= loadpin/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SAFESETID)       += safesetid/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM)	+= lockdown/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE)		+= device_cgroup.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM)			+= bpf/
>  
>  # Object integrity file lists
>  subdir-$(CONFIG_INTEGRITY)		+= integrity
> diff --git a/security/bpf/Makefile b/security/bpf/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c7a89a962084
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/security/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) := hooks.o
> diff --git a/security/bpf/hooks.c b/security/bpf/hooks.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..68e5824868f9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/security/bpf/hooks.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
> + */
> +#include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
> +
> +/* Some LSM hooks do not have 0 as their default return values. Override the
> + * __weak definitons generated by default for these hooks
> + */
> +noinline int bpf_lsm_inode_getsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> +				       void **buffer, bool alloc)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +noinline int bpf_lsm_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> +				       const void *value, size_t size,
> +				       int flags)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +noinline int bpf_lsm_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2,
> +				unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4,
> +				unsigned long arg5)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +noinline int bpf_lsm_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x,
> +					       struct xfrm_policy *xp,
> +					       const struct flowi *fl)
> +{
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
> +	#define LSM_HOOK(RET, NAME, ...) LSM_HOOK_INIT(NAME, bpf_lsm_##NAME),
> +	#include <linux/lsm_hook_names.h>
> +	#undef LSM_HOOK
> +};
> +
> +static int __init bpf_lsm_init(void)
> +{
> +	security_add_hooks(bpf_lsm_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_lsm_hooks), "bpf");
> +	pr_info("LSM support for eBPF active\n");
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_LSM(bpf) = {
> +	.name = "bpf",
> +	.init = bpf_lsm_init,

Have you given up on the "BPF must be last" requirement?

> +};