[PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] bpf: lsm: Initialize the BPF LSM hooks

Kees Cook keescook at chromium.org
Mon Mar 23 22:12:57 UTC 2020


On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:58:18PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> That's not too terrible, I suppose. What would you be thinking for
> the calls that do use call_int_hook()?
> 
> 	rc = call_int_hook(something, something_default, goodnesses);
> 
> or embedded in the macro:
> 
> 	rc = call_int_hook(something, goodnesses);

Oh yes, good point. The hook call already knows the name, so:

#define call_int_hook(FUNC, ...) ({                        \
        int RC = FUNC#_default;                            \
...


-- 
Kees Cook




More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list