[PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] bpf: lsm: Initialize the BPF LSM hooks
Kees Cook
keescook at chromium.org
Mon Mar 23 22:12:57 UTC 2020
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:58:18PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> That's not too terrible, I suppose. What would you be thinking for
> the calls that do use call_int_hook()?
>
> rc = call_int_hook(something, something_default, goodnesses);
>
> or embedded in the macro:
>
> rc = call_int_hook(something, goodnesses);
Oh yes, good point. The hook call already knows the name, so:
#define call_int_hook(FUNC, ...) ({ \
int RC = FUNC#_default; \
...
--
Kees Cook
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list