[PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] bpf: lsm: Initialize the BPF LSM hooks
KP Singh
kpsingh at chromium.org
Mon Mar 23 16:44:13 UTC 2020
From: KP Singh <kpsingh at google.com>
The bpf_lsm_ nops are initialized into the LSM framework like any other
LSM. Some LSM hooks do not have 0 as their default return value. The
__weak symbol for these hooks is overridden by a corresponding
definition in security/bpf/hooks.c
The LSM can be enabled / disabled with CONFIG_LSM.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh at google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb at google.com>
Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest at google.com>
---
security/Kconfig | 10 ++++----
security/Makefile | 2 ++
security/bpf/Makefile | 5 ++++
security/bpf/hooks.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 security/bpf/Makefile
create mode 100644 security/bpf/hooks.c
diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
index 2a1a2d396228..cd3cc7da3a55 100644
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -277,11 +277,11 @@ endchoice
config LSM
string "Ordered list of enabled LSMs"
- default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
- default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
- default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
- default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
- default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor"
+ default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
+ default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
+ default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
+ default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
+ default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf"
help
A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order.
Any LSMs left off this list will be ignored. This can be
diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile
index 746438499029..22e73a3482bd 100644
--- a/security/Makefile
+++ b/security/Makefile
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA) += yama
subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOADPIN) += loadpin
subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SAFESETID) += safesetid
subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM) += lockdown
+subdir-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) += bpf
# always enable default capabilities
obj-y += commoncap.o
@@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOADPIN) += loadpin/
obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SAFESETID) += safesetid/
obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM) += lockdown/
obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE) += device_cgroup.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) += bpf/
# Object integrity file lists
subdir-$(CONFIG_INTEGRITY) += integrity
diff --git a/security/bpf/Makefile b/security/bpf/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c7a89a962084
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/bpf/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) := hooks.o
diff --git a/security/bpf/hooks.c b/security/bpf/hooks.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..68e5824868f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/bpf/hooks.c
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
+ */
+#include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
+
+/* Some LSM hooks do not have 0 as their default return values. Override the
+ * __weak definitons generated by default for these hooks
+ */
+noinline int bpf_lsm_inode_getsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
+ void **buffer, bool alloc)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+noinline int bpf_lsm_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
+ const void *value, size_t size,
+ int flags)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+noinline int bpf_lsm_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2,
+ unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4,
+ unsigned long arg5)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
+noinline int bpf_lsm_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x,
+ struct xfrm_policy *xp,
+ const struct flowi *fl)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
+ #define LSM_HOOK(RET, NAME, ...) LSM_HOOK_INIT(NAME, bpf_lsm_##NAME),
+ #include <linux/lsm_hook_names.h>
+ #undef LSM_HOOK
+};
+
+static int __init bpf_lsm_init(void)
+{
+ security_add_hooks(bpf_lsm_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_lsm_hooks), "bpf");
+ pr_info("LSM support for eBPF active\n");
+ return 0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_LSM(bpf) = {
+ .name = "bpf",
+ .init = bpf_lsm_init,
+};
--
2.20.1
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list