[PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] bpf: Attachment verification for BPF_MODIFY_RETURN

KP Singh kpsingh at chromium.org
Wed Mar 4 15:13:37 UTC 2020


On 03-Mär 21:12, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:56 PM KP Singh <kpsingh at chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh at google.com>
> >
> > - Allow BPF_MODIFY_RETURN attachment only to functions that are:
> >
> >     * Whitelisted by for error injection i.e. by checking
> >       within_error_injection_list. Similar disucssions happened for the
> >       bpf_overrie_return helper.
> 
> 2 typos: discussions and bpf_override_return ;)

/me bows his head in shame ;) Fixed.

 -KP

> 
> >
> >     * security hooks, this is expected to be cleaned up with the LSM
> >       changes after the KRSI patches introduce the LSM_HOOK macro:
> >
> >         https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200220175250.10795-1-kpsingh@chromium.org/
> >
> > - The attachment is currently limited to functions that return an int.
> >   This can be extended later other types (e.g. PTR).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh at google.com>
> > ---
> 
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin at fb.com>
> 
> >  kernel/bpf/btf.c      | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> [...]



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list