[PATCH 3/8] seccomp: Introduce SECCOMP_PIN_ARCHITECTURE
Jann Horn
jannh at google.com
Wed Jun 17 15:31:59 UTC 2020
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:30 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:25 AM Jann Horn <jannh at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:49 AM Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > For systems that provide multiple syscall maps based on architectures
> > > (e.g. AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64 and AUDIT_ARCH_I386 via CONFIG_COMPAT), allow
> > > a fast way to pin the process to a specific syscall mapping, instead of
> > > needing to generate all filters with an architecture check as the first
> > > filter action.
> >
> > This seems reasonable; but can we maybe also add X86-specific handling
> > for that X32 mess? AFAIK there are four ways to do syscalls with
> > AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64:
>
> You're out of date :) I fixed the mess.
>
> commit 6365b842aae4490ebfafadfc6bb27a6d3cc54757
> Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org>
> Date: Wed Jul 3 13:34:04 2019 -0700
>
> x86/syscalls: Split the x32 syscalls into their own table
Oooooh, beautiful. Thank you very much for that.
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list