[PATCH v3 4/5] LSM: Define SELinux function to measure security state
Mimi Zohar
zohar at linux.ibm.com
Mon Jul 20 17:26:52 UTC 2020
On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 13:06 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>
>
> I applied the patch series on top of the next-integrity branch, added
> measure func=LSM_STATE to ima-policy, and booted that kernel. I get
> the following entries in ascii_runtime_measurements, but seemingly
> missing the final field:
>
> 10 8a09c48af4f8a817f59b495bd82971e096e2e367 ima-ng
> sha256:21c3d7b09b62b4d0b3ed15ba990f816b94808f90b76787bfae755c4b3a44cd24
> selinux-state
> 10 e610908931d70990a2855ddb33c16af2d82ce56a ima-ng
> sha256:c8898652afd5527ef4eaf8d85f5fee1d91fcccee34bc97f6e55b96746bedb318
> selinux-policy-hash
>
> Thus, I cannot verify. What am I missing?
Missing is "template=ima-buf" on the policy rule.
Tyler's patch set just added some support for verifying the policy.
Refer to ima_validate_rule(). There are still some things missing.
For example, nayna noticed that making sure that asymmetric key
support is enabled. Another example is requiring "template=" for any
of the buffer measurements. Template names can be defined
dynamically, so it will need to support either format:
measure func=KEXEC_CMDLINE template=ima-buf
measure func=KEXEC_CMDLINE template=d-ng|n-ng|buf
Mimi
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list