[PATCH v6 0/7] capabilities: Introduce CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
Christian Brauner
christian.brauner at ubuntu.com
Sun Jul 19 18:17:29 UTC 2020
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 12:04:10PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> This is v6 of the 'Introduce CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE' patchset. The
> changes to v5 are:
>
> * split patch dealing with /proc/self/exe into two patches:
> * first patch to enable changing it with CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
> and detailed history in the commit message
> * second patch changes -EINVAL to -EPERM
> * use kselftest_harness.h infrastructure for test
> * replace if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || !capable(CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE))
> with if (!checkpoint_restore_ns_capable(&init_user_ns))
>
> Adrian Reber (5):
> capabilities: Introduce CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
> pid: use checkpoint_restore_ns_capable() for set_tid
> pid_namespace: use checkpoint_restore_ns_capable() for ns_last_pid
> proc: allow access in init userns for map_files with
> CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
> selftests: add clone3() CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE test
>
> Nicolas Viennot (2):
> prctl: Allow local CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE to change /proc/self/exe
> prctl: exe link permission error changed from -EINVAL to -EPERM
>
> fs/proc/base.c | 8 +-
> include/linux/capability.h | 6 +
> include/uapi/linux/capability.h | 9 +-
> kernel/pid.c | 2 +-
> kernel/pid_namespace.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sys.c | 13 +-
> security/selinux/include/classmap.h | 5 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/clone3/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/clone3/Makefile | 4 +-
> .../clone3/clone3_cap_checkpoint_restore.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++
> 10 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_cap_checkpoint_restore.c
>
> base-commit: d31958b30ea3b7b6e522d6bf449427748ad45822
Adrian, Nicolas thank you!
I grabbed the series to run the various core test-suites we've added
over the last year and pushed it to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux.git/log/?h=cap_checkpoint_restore
for now to let kbuild/ltp chew on it for a bit.
Thanks!
Christian
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list