[PATCH 06/13] fs/kernel_read_file: Remove redundant size argument

[Scott Branden]

Hi Kees,

On 2020-07-17 3:06 p.m., Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:04:18PM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
>> On 2020-07-17 10:43 a.m., Kees Cook wrote:
>>> In preparation for refactoring kernel_read_file*(), remove the redundant
>>> "size" argument which is not needed: it can be included in the return
>> I don't think the size argument is redundant though.
>> The existing kernel_read_file functions always read the whole file.
>> Now, what happens if the file is bigger than the buffer.
>> How does kernel_read_file know it read the whole file by looking at the
>> return value?
> Yes; an entirely reasonable concern. This is why I add the file_size
> output argument later in the series.
There is something wrong with this patch.  I apply patches 1-5 and these 
pass the kernel self test.
Patch 6 does not pass the kernel-selftest/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh

>>> code, with callers adjusted. (VFS reads already cannot be larger than
>>> INT_MAX.)
>>> [...]
>>> -	if (i_size > SIZE_MAX || (max_size > 0 && i_size > max_size)) {
>>> +	if (i_size > INT_MAX || (max_size > 0 && i_size > max_size)) {
>> Should this be SSIZE_MAX?
> No, for two reasons: then we need to change the return value and likely
> the callers need more careful checks, and more importantly, because the
> VFS already limits single read actions to INT_MAX, so limits above this
> make no sense. Win win! :)
>