[PATCH] [RFC] xfs: initialise attr fork on inode create
Christoph Hellwig
hch at infradead.org
Fri Dec 4 07:54:05 UTC 2020
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:44:26AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > + if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY) && dir->i_sb->s_security) ||
> > > + default_acl || acl)
> > > + need_xattr = true;
> > > +
> > > + error = xfs_create(XFS_I(dir), &name, mode, rdev,
> > > + need_xattr, &ip);
> >
> > It might be wort to factor the condition into a little helper. Also
> > I think we also have security labels for O_TMPFILE inodes, so it might
> > be worth plugging into that path as well.
>
> Yeah, a helper is a good idea - I just wanted to get some feedback
> first on whether it's a good idea to peek directly at
> i_sb->s_security or whether there is some other way of knowing ahead
> of time that a security xattr is going to be created. I couldn't
> find one, but that doesn't mean such an interface doesn't exist in
> all the twisty passages of the LSM layers...
I've added the relevant list, maybe someone there has an opinion.
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list