[PATCH] IMA: Handle early boot data measurement
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
nramas at linux.microsoft.com
Tue Aug 25 17:55:46 UTC 2020
On 8/25/20 10:42 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>>>
>>> Please limit the changes in this patch to renaming the functions and/or
>>> files. For example, adding "measure_payload_hash" should be a separate
>>> patch, not hidden here.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback Mimi.
>>
>> I'll split this into 2 patches:
>>
>> PATCH 1: Rename files + rename CONFIG
>> PATCH 2: Update IMA hook to utilize early boot data measurement.
>
> I'm referring to introducing the "measure_payload_hash" flag. I assume
> this is to indicate whether the buffer should be hashed or not.
>
> Example 1: ima_alloc_key_entry() and ima_alloc_data_entry(0 comparison
>> -static struct ima_key_entry *ima_alloc_key_entry(struct key *keyring,
>> - const void *payload,
>> - size_t payload_len)
>> -{
>
>
>> +static struct ima_data_entry *ima_alloc_data_entry(const char *event_name,
>> + const void *payload,
>> + size_t payload_len,
>> + const char *event_data,
>> + enum ima_hooks func,
>> + bool measure_payload_hash) <====
>> +{
>
> Example 2:
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
> index a74095793936..65423754765f 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
> @@ -37,9 +37,10 @@ void ima_post_key_create_or_update(struct key *keyring, struct key *key,
> if (!payload || (payload_len == 0))
> return;
>
> - if (ima_should_queue_key())
> - queued = ima_queue_key(keyring, payload, payload_len);
> -
> + if (ima_should_queue_data())
> + queued = ima_queue_data(keyring->description, payload,
> + payload_len, keyring->description,
> + KEY_CHECK, false); <===
> if (queued)
> return;
>
> But in general, as much as possible function and file name changes
> should be done independently of other changes.
>
> thanks,
I agree - but in this case, Tushar's patch series on adding support for
"Critical Data" measurement has already introduced
"measure_payload_hash" flag. His patch updates
"process_buffer_measurement()" to take this new flag and measure hash of
the given data.
My patches extend that to queuing the early boot requests and processing
them after a custom IMA policy is loaded.
If you still think "measure_payload_hash" flag should be introduced in
the queuing change as a separate patch I'll split the patches further.
Please let me know.
thanks,
-lakshmi
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list