[PATCH 05/11] evm: Allow xattr/attr operations for portable signatures if check fails
Mimi Zohar
zohar at linux.ibm.com
Mon Aug 24 12:16:46 UTC 2020
On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 18:01 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> If files with portable signatures are copied from one location to another
> or are extracted from an archive, verification can temporarily fail until
> all xattrs/attrs are set in the destination. Portable signatures are the
> only ones that can be moved to different files, as they don't depend on
> system-specific information such as the inode generation.
^Only portable signatures may be moved or copied from one file to
another, as they ... Instead portable signatures must include
"security.ima".
> Unlike other security.evm types, portable signatures
^, EVM portable signatures are also immutable. They
> can never be replaced
> even if an xattr/attr operation is granted, as once evm_update_evmxattr()
> detects this type, it returns without updating the HMAC. Thus, it wouldn't
> be a problem to allow those operations so that verification passes on the
> destination after all xattrs/attrs are copied.
This needs to be reworded a bit.
>
> This patch first introduces a new integrity status called
> INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE, that allows callers of
> evm_verify_current_integrity() to detect that a portable signature didn't
> pass verification and then adds an exception in evm_protect_xattr() and
> evm_inode_setattr() for this status and returns 0 instead of -EPERM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
After this patch, nothing prevents modifying the xattrs after all of
them are in place and the signature verification would be successful.
(Ok, that is being addressed in subsequent patches.)
> ---
> include/linux/integrity.h | 1 +
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/integrity.h b/include/linux/integrity.h
> index 2271939c5c31..2ea0f2f65ab6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/integrity.h
> +++ b/include/linux/integrity.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ enum integrity_status {
> INTEGRITY_PASS = 0,
> INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE,
> INTEGRITY_FAIL,
> + INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE,
> INTEGRITY_NOLABEL,
> INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS,
> INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN,
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> index 4e9f5e8b21d5..30072030f05d 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
> int evm_initialized;
>
> static const char * const integrity_status_msg[] = {
> - "pass", "pass_immutable", "fail", "no_label", "no_xattrs", "unknown"
> + "pass", "pass_immutable", "fail", "fail_immutable", "no_label",
> + "no_xattrs", "unknown"
> };
> int evm_hmac_attrs;
>
> @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry,
> enum integrity_status evm_status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
> struct evm_digest digest;
> struct inode *inode;
> - int rc, xattr_len;
> + int rc, xattr_len, evm_immutable = 0;
>
> if (iint && (iint->evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS ||
> iint->evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE))
> @@ -179,8 +180,10 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry,
> if (rc)
> rc = -EINVAL;
> break;
> - case EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG:
> case EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG:
> + evm_immutable = 1;
> + fallthrough;
> + case EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG:
> /* accept xattr with non-empty signature field */
> if (xattr_len <= sizeof(struct signature_v2_hdr)) {
> evm_status = INTEGRITY_FAIL;
> @@ -219,7 +222,8 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry,
>
> if (rc)
> evm_status = (rc == -ENODATA) ?
> - INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS : INTEGRITY_FAIL;
> + INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS : evm_immutable ?
> + INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE : INTEGRITY_FAIL;
Embedded ternary operator should be replaced with normal C syntax.
> out:
> if (iint)
> iint->evm_status = evm_status;
> @@ -351,6 +355,12 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
> -EPERM, 0);
> }
> out:
> + /* It is safe to allow fail_immutable, portable signatures can never be
> + * updated
> + */
Replace "It" with "Writing other xattrs". Writing other xattrs is
safe for portable signatures, as portable signatures are immutable and
...."
> + if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE)
> + return 0;
> +
> if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS)
> integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry),
> dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata",
> @@ -488,9 +498,14 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
> if (!(ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID)))
> return 0;
> evm_status = evm_verify_current_integrity(dentry);
> + /* It is safe to allow fail_immutable, portable signatures can never
> + * be updated
> + */
Replace "It" with what is safe.
Mimi
> if ((evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS) ||
> - (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS))
> + (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS) ||
> + (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE))
> return 0;
> +
> integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry),
> dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata",
> integrity_status_msg[evm_status], -EPERM, 0);
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> index a9649b04b9f1..21bda264fc30 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> @@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
> case INTEGRITY_NOLABEL: /* No security.evm xattr. */
> cause = "missing-HMAC";
> goto out;
> + case INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE:
> case INTEGRITY_FAIL: /* Invalid HMAC/signature. */
> cause = "invalid-HMAC";
> goto out;
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list