[PATCH v20 05/12] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock

Mickaël Salaün mic at digikod.net
Thu Aug 13 14:15:01 UTC 2020


On 12/08/2020 21:16, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On 8/2/20 5:58 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> From: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>
>>
>> Move management of the superblock->sb_security blob out
>> of the individual security modules and into the security
>> infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within
>> the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much
>> space is required, and the space is allocated there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
>> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen at canonical.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <sds at tycho.nsa.gov>
>> Reviewed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic at digikod.net>
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829232935.7099-2-casey@schaufler-ca.com
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v17:
>> * Rebase the original LSM stacking patch from v5.3 to v5.7: I fixed some
>>    diff conflicts caused by code moves and function renames in
>>    selinux/include/objsec.h and selinux/hooks.c .  I checked that it
>>    builds but I didn't test the changes for SELinux nor SMACK.
> 
> You shouldn't retain Signed-off-by and Reviewed-by lines from an earlier
> patch if you made non-trivial changes to it (even more so if you didn't
> test them).

I think I made trivial changes according to the original patch. But
without reply from other people with Signed-off-by or Reviewed-by
(Casey, Kees, John), I'll remove them. I guess you don't want your
Reviewed-by to be kept, so I'll remove it, except if you want to review
this patch (or the modified part).



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list