[PATCH RESEND v11 7/8] proc: use human-readable values for hidepid

Alexey Gladkov gladkov.alexey at gmail.com
Sun Apr 19 14:19:15 UTC 2020

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 02:05:50PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey at gmail.com> writes:
> > The hidepid parameter values are becoming more and more and it becomes
> > difficult to remember what each new magic number means.
> So I relooked at the code.  And I think I was misreading things.
> However I think it is a legitimate concern.
> Can you please mention in your description of this change that
> switching from fsparam_u32 to fs_param_string is safe even when
> using the new mount api because fsparam_u32 and fs_param_string
> both are sent from userspace with "fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, ...)".


> Or words to that effect.  Ideally you will even manually test that case
> to confirm.

I will add a selftest for this.

Rgrds, legion

More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list